Simp Chat Sophie Mudd - Discussion Thread

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

it's crap like that that is the reason her and these others will never show the goods, there is just no need, they make too much for not showing it and once they were to show it all, many would lose interest and stop paying what they currently are...

until these fools stop paying and these women stop earning so much for doing nothing, then nothing will ever change

 

[NoodzHunter]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

and some folks say "well... these girls have a limited window in which to make that kind of money because their looks will fade, and that money has to last a lifetime."

I think that mentality is bullshit. For one, MILF porn is a thing. Secondly, OF is too new and that theory hasn't been tested.

Someone like Sophie can probably go until she's in her 40s.

And with an agency running her account, I would imagine you are talking 5-10 hours of work a week TOPS for her

 

[1dwts1]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Chloe Lamb a 10? ehhh... maybe a few years ago

 

[Pete Wisdom]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Why would they lose interest once she gets naked? Has that theory been proven yet? Some of these guys are addicted and are fans of a particular girl and they don't care what type of content she puts out.

 

[Mrstash4934]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Fully agree, though I would replace "some" with "most". Continuing to tip a girl that you rationally have to KNOW is not going to show anything on the hope that maybe, just maybe, she will this time is a clear example of disordered thinking. Paying anything in excess of $0.00 for non-nude content is a questionable decision. People are basically paying someone like Sophie solely bc she is pretty. But you'll never convince them to stop paying bc none of this is rational behavior.

You can swindle a rational person exactly once. You can swindle an addict until they have nothing left to take. Sadly, the OF model is based on the latter. It could have been a fair marketplace for actual content sales, but once someone realized that addicts will just pay, it became a race to the bottom. Give as little as possible for as much as you can charge. Imagine any legit industry trying to install that business model. It only works when the customers cannot help themselves.....

 

[Trey824]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

That’s so bad!

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

This is what I keep hearing from some of the women. That once they show nips, that a certain chunk of customers will bail cause they finally saw them and there's nothing they can sell as a "tease" or "trick" anymore... not sure how true it is but I guess I understand it to a certain extent.

I think another part of this theory from the model standpoint is that they would only show them once then go back to not showing them. If we saw them the one time, then they reverted back to form, would many stick around for the non-nip content after seeing the nips finally? I do doubt that.

And yes, it would be dumb to show them once and then not continue to show them but that mindset is probably like posing for Playboy magazine back in the day. When a famous Person did it, it was often 1 time thing, they weren't necessarily always doing nude shoots or movies afterwards.

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

I don't get this mindset either. Not saying it doesn't happen but when you look at somebody like Sydney Sweeney she has gone nude something like 4 or 5 times now and people can't wait to see her nude again in Anyone But You and are leaking topless videos of her because they want more. I think if Sophie were to go topless it would be the opposite of that and she would blow up more and get more people subscribing and wanting to see her content.

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

AGREE in a general sense. i guess, as I try to understand the mindset, I'd say 3 things:

1) Sydney is obviously a very rare breed in that she appears to really enjoy showing them off, and not all women are like that. Maybe Sophie and the others that drive us nuts aren't wired the same way and don't want to always be showing them.

2) Sydney is a famous actress and I think there's more of an "aura" around it every time she does it (especially knowing it can only be rare in movies/TV) vs an Onlyfans model who could do it every single day if they desire.

3) Sydney gets paid very well for her acting and showing them even briefly. While Onlyfans models would get paid well for that first nude photo set or video and some after, eventually, as I said, they think the buys would decrease. Another reason for this would be the line is always moving, right? So now they don't show nips we want nips... say they show nips... after a while (if they even continue to keep showing them) it becomes, show vag or show your guy playing with them... the demand will always keep increasing so if they don't do that stuff people will keep being disappointed.

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Also, another thing that plays a huge role in this: Most, if not all of the popular ones who won't show them (Sophie, Hannah Palmer, etc.) have HUGE spenders they do send nudes/nip content too. Guys who won't leak and spend thousands to get this stuff. They get off on the exclusivity of it. On knowing only them and MAYBE a few others are seeing the goods... Once these models make the nips viewable for all for a price tag well under what the big spenders are paying, those guys almost certainly get angry and bail.

 

[jonse13]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

That's a possibility but I doubt it. They probably do the same shit with them as well. I remember there was a guy that offered $2k for Sophie Mudd for topless but she refused. Like even let's say someone sends $20k, what stops her from taking the money and never sending anything in return ? Have seen this happen countless times, but on a way smaller scale than $20k, maybe up to $1k.

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

You bring up some good points about Sydney and it is refreshing to see an Actress as hot as her being more than happy to show the goods for her roles and she has said she is open to posing nude for modelling too as long as it is tasteful so I think we've got a real winner with that one and could only wish somebody like Jennifer Love Hewitt had been more like that back in the day. I think with Sydney too she likes knowing there are a lot of men and even women that are attracted to her and want to see her do more nude scenes and she is using that to try and get more people to watch the movies and shows she is in. She has also listed actresses like Angelina Jolie, Kate Winslet, Julianne Moore and Heather Graham as some of her favorite actress - all of whom have done a lot of nude scenes over the years so that is another reason why she might be more open to nudity.

When I think about Sophie Mudd though I think of another model like Tessa Fowler who made a career out of showing them and bared everything else along the way too and wonder why they went in such different directions of each other and if Sophie would have been more popular if she had just gone nude from the start since Tessa was one of the most popular big boobed models on the net when she was active and had quite a loyal following over the years. I think it must come down to the way they both view nudity and Sophie must be more prudish or only want to share her body with her partners which sucks for us if true. You are also right about people wanting more and I read recently on another site somebody asked MadiKat about doing topless photos and she said she had been seriously considering doing some topless sets for a while and was waiting for a special date but she is worried people will want more and won't respect her boundaries and she is not a porn star or something along those lines so it might be the same case with Sophie. It sounds like the huge spenders ruin things for us too and bet some of them would be pissed off if she started going topless regularly after they have spent so much money getting what they thought was exclusive content for their eyes only. 🤣

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

I remember reading on Reddit a few years back somebody offered Emily Sears a very large sum of money to go nude and she basically told them to fuck off and she didn't need the money and wouldn't be bribed into doing something she was uncomfortable doing.

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

I can tell you for a fact they have big big spenders they send content to the rest of us don’t get. How many of them and what the cost is for said content I don’t know. All I know is that they exist. These girls arent making 6 figures a month selling implied nudes or non-nip content for $10-50 a pop to a bunch of us lol

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Emily is a rare/odd bird. She is very into women’s rights and stuff and won’t be “bought” and never cared to show the nips for whatever reason. Certainly there are some like her who refuse no matter what but I also believe everyone has a price. Offer most of these women enough and you’ll get what you want just a matter of if you can afford it.

 

[NoodzHunter]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

because they came from different places. Sophie was an "Instagram Model" before OF and Tessa was pre-OF and went the route of the adult industry.

At the time Tessa came out, it was simply expected that models get nude to some extent. There really was no demand for non-nude. That was born with the rise of Instagram. Then a whole industry of non-nude was born with OF. And with OF, the idea of sending out PPV and communicating with fans allowed the scamming to start.

Even in the beginning stages of OF, it was expected that creators get nude, but then all the Instagram sluts migrated over to OF, and BOOM! Here we are today, with overpriced content and endless scamming.

Pre-OF, there were non-nude and nude creators on Patreon and that was kind of a proto-OF, but they tried to sell their goods as "artistic" to meet Patreon's terms of service.

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Yeah. What is strange with her too is she is close friends with porn stars like Angela White and most of her other model friends like Laura Lux have done nudity. She also mentioned on Twitter how she loves to have spas nude with other women and all her friends are used to seeing her nude but she won't go nude for modelling. I do agree that everybody has a price though and with Emily I remember her saying about going nude for Playboy years ago but I guess they didn't give her the offer she wanted. She probably wanted millions and thought she could get it.

 

[NoodzHunter]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

It is also well known that many Instagram "models" are paid millions by rich middle easterners to fly out to Dubai and do some of the grossest sexual acts possible. Yeah... just some of those "normal" Instagram thots who otherwise don't even do OF or anything. That's been going on for years. They take the money and never work again, and go on to lead normal lives.

 

[NoodzHunter]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

women actually don't (didn't?) get paid that much for Playboy. The CyberGirls and all that online got paid very little. I am talking about the lesser known models who did a couple shoots.

Of course the Playmates and bunnies got paid a lot.

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Yeah. I didn't think they would have been I think there was a belief in the past that Playboy was the big time and they would get a huge amount of money if they went nude for the Magazine probably because they offered some famous Actresses a million to pose nude. The stars of Desperate Housewives for example turned down a $9.5 million offer to go nude for Playboy. Emily probably thinks highly of herself and was expecting to get star treatment.

Please, Log in or Register to see links and images