Simp Chat Sophie Mudd - Discussion Thread

[xS3R4PH]

sophie is getting paid for videos and photos, what people do with them is out of her control

again, unless there is evidence she is providing actual sexual acts then she is not a sex worker...

doing 2 minutes of research will provide you with this information, a sex worker is almost strictly a term for escorts/prostitutes... i even expanded it to include strippers... and now you're expanding it to include women on onlyfans/the internet... wow, just wow... thanks for making my day with this comedy routine... again, get out of parents basement once in a while...

The term "sex worker" was coined in 1978 by sex worker activist Carol Leigh.[5] Its use became popularized after publication of the anthology, Sex Work: Writings By Women In The Sex Industry in 1987, edited by Frédérique Delacoste and Priscilla Alexander.[6][7][8] The term "sex worker" has since spread into much wider use, including in academic publications, by NGOs and labor unions, and by governmental and intergovernmental agencies, such as the World Health Organization.[9] The term is listed in the Oxford English Dictionary[2] and Merriam-Webster's Dictionary.[10]

The term "sex worker" is used by some types of sex workers (i.e. prostitutes) to avoid invoking the stigma associated with the word "prostitute". Using the term "sex worker" rather than "prostitute" also allows more members of the sex industry to be represented and helps ensure that individuals who are actually prostitutes are not singled out and associated with the negative connotations of "prostitute". In addition, choosing to use the term "sex worker" rather than "prostitute" shows ownership over the individuals' career choices. Some argue that those who prefer the term "sex worker" wish to separate their occupation from their person. Describing someone as a sex worker recognizes that the individual may have many different facets, and are not necessarily defined by their job.

and here is the actual dictionary definition: a person employed in the sex industry, as a prostitute, pornographic film actor, stripper, nude model, or creator of sexually explicit online content.

so lets break it down: she is not in the sex industry, no evidence she is a prostitute, she isn't a pornographic film actor, she is not a stripper, she does not do nude modeling and is not the creator of sexually EXPLICIT content

to quote you: You can't change the meaning of words at will. That's not how language works.

Funny thing is that you just forgot to post this part of the text you got from Wikipedia:

Sex work can take the form of prostitution, stripping or lap dancing, performance in pornography, phone or internet sex, or **any other exchange of sexual services for financial or material gain**

First, the meaning of words is not given by the reason why that word was created, but by the way society uses that word. It's literally common sense that most content creators who produce the same type of content that Sophie does are sex workers. The creators who make the same erotic material as her refer to themselves as sex workers, on reddit there are several examples.

Second, sex work consists of providing sexual services and getting paid for it. This type of service is not restricted to physical contact. You are the one adding this rule.

Third, her not making explicit content doesn't mean she doesn't make sexual content and for me to have to say that is ridiculous. She posts photos completely naked, teasing buyers on all fours arching her ass, VIDEOS TAKING A SHOWER, videos massaging her breasts, messages asking you to cum for her... How is this not erotic content? Are you demented?

 

[PhilipIrvine]

Funny thing is that you just forgot to post this part of the text you got from Wikipedia:

Sex work can take the form of prostitution, stripping or lap dancing, performance in pornography, phone or internet sex, or **any other exchange of sexual services for financial or material gain**

First, the meaning of words is not given by the reason why that word was created, but by the way society uses that word. It's literally common sense that most content creators who produce the same type of content that Sophie does are sex workers. The creators who make the same erotic material as her refer to themselves as sex workers, on reddit there are several examples.

Second, sex work consists of providing sexual services and getting paid for it. This type of service is not restricted to physical contact. You are the one adding this rule.

Third, her not making explicit content doesn't mean she doesn't make sexual content and for me to have to say that is ridiculous. She posts photos completely naked, teasing buyers on all fours arching her ass, VIDEOS TAKING A SHOWER, videos massaging her breasts, messages asking you to cum for her... How is this not erotic content? Are you demented?

videos in a shower, massaging her breasts are not nude and are not erotic content unless the viewer feels they are, that is out of her control... the messages are not even generated by her as everyone knows by now, they are written by her agency, hate to inform you/break the news but you aren't actually talking to sophie in the chats/messages

again, she is not exchanging sexual services nor is she doing phone or internet sex... photos/videos of her somewhat nude are not sex in any way except for a warped mind

and nude content would be her showing her nips and vag (which she never does)

we clearly aren't going to agree on this because you choose to equate what all women do that turns any man on to an actual sex worker

by your very wide-ranging and absurd definition, any woman who has ever gained something financial because she is hot/sexy is a sex worker I guess (if they've gotten a free drink at a bar, let out of a speeding ticket, some kind of hook up on a purchase, etc. etc.)...

you go on thinking what you are and i'll go on thinking what i am

 

[The Drifter]

Let's agree to disagree and stop turning this thread into defining the meaning of sex worker.

 

[Pete Wisdom]

videos in a shower, massaging her breasts are not nude and are not erotic content unless the viewer feels they are, that is out of her control... the messages are not even generated by her as everyone knows by now, they are written by her agency, hate to inform you/break the news but you aren't actually talking to sophie in the chats/messages

again, she is not exchanging sexual services nor is she doing phone or internet sex... photos/videos of her somewhat nude are not sex in any way except for a warped mind

and nude content would be her showing her nips and vag (which she never does)

we clearly aren't going to agree on this because you choose to equate what all women do that turns any man on to an actual sex worker

by your very wide-ranging and absurd definition, any woman who has ever gained something financial because she is hot/sexy is a sex worker I guess (if they've gotten a free drink at a bar, let out of a speeding ticket, some kind of hook up on a purchase, etc. etc.)...

you go on thinking what you are and i'll go on thinking what i am

No isn't Sophie sending messages or writing the captions but she's the one that is mainly profiting from it and her likeness is being used with her permission and that's on all Sophie.

I'm tempted to comment on sex worker stuff but I won't on which I agree with you on some of your points and I slightly agree more the other guys points.

 

[Kush_Daz]

lol to not make that "assumption" is laughable. that dead eyed, always board look doesnt just spawn out of nowhere. that shits cultivated in broken toys, just like on facialabuse.

she is daddy's little sugar pig in pvt. she prob has a little monogramed dog bowl to puke into that she travels with.
10 -15 more lbs = baby fever = preggo pics

ok just to divert the convo away from the "is it sex work?" debate...

anyone else thinks this person might be watching way too much porn? im kinda worried... and disturbed.

 

[thathead]

the sex work debate is not relevant because anyone who looks can see the vacant look in her eyes, its in like almost every photo. and that is def done by her intentionally. even when posing w/ other models she looks aloof, bored and asexual. she smiles like shes wearing a mask she has practiced for years.

First she was daddy's little pony, then a thoroughbred for a few years and now shes the race horse nearing the end man. Gravity and time are like rabid dogs running up from behind and nipping at her ankles. its a race no one wins. shes not the prize horse anymore. the wall is nigh lol

shes prob stretching out her backdoor for an ass2ass show right now

 

[AlexMinas2002]

She aint gonna show shit we just have to face that reality, but I dont understand the people still paying for that shit knowing they can go to her insta and find better (free) stuff on there since its the same shit she posts on both

 

[Kush_Daz]

the sex work debate is not relevant because anyone who looks can see the vacant look in her eyes, its in like almost every photo. and that is def done by her intentionally. even when posing w/ other models she looks aloof, bored and asexual. she smiles like shes wearing a mask she has practiced for years.

First she was daddy's little pony, then a thoroughbred for a few years and now shes the race horse nearing the end man. Gravity and time are like rabid dogs running up from behind and nipping at her ankles. its a race no one wins. shes not the prize horse anymore. the wall is nigh lol

shes prob stretching out her backdoor for an ass2ass show right now

Ok firstly, you needa chill. But funny thing you mention that "bored" look of hers. I've noticed that a lot of rich girls (as in 'grew up rich') have that bored, nonchalant or even distant look. It's like their... default face setting (if that makes sense ), so you won't see it if they're laughing, smiling, frowning etc. but you see it when they're not expressing strong emotions.

It's actually something I've noticed for years. I remember this comment I saw on reddit awhile back, under a Natalie Aly Lind post, and it was talking about the exact same thing, this default, unenthusiastic look that these 'trust fund' girls have (and please note Natalie Aly Lind is of similar background to Sophie, they both grew up in Hollywood). At the time I was surprised because I thought I was the only one that noticed it, but from the comments a few others had noticed it too.

Honestly, I think that unenthusiastic look stems from an overall lack of drive and motivation, which is a result of growing up and basically getting everything you wanted.

I could be wrong... maybe there's no "look", maybe me and the others in that reddit thread were just looking too much into things.

 

[thathead]

lind's daddy issues and sophies are very diff.
imo every pic mudd takes is for his approval and attention. when he ignores her too long or gives her too many weekends/days off in a row the nip slip pics start dropping.
Like if her areolas are freaky looking in natural lighting then why doesnt she just put magic marker on them or some make up? She probably has a whole list of BS restrictions shes not allowed to do online including looking like she is enjoying herself. he's prob a megalomaniac. i wonder what the mothers like. do they all get together for a pvt show over the holidays lol

 

[jonse13]

She hadn't sold content 6 years ago.

Doesn't matter. She used to " model ". Which means she hasn't shown her tits for 6 years

 

[Myusernameisusername]

Again if you think that stripping in a club and letting guys touch you in private lap dances or escorting (real sex work) is the same as selling non-nude images and videos with sexual captions on onlyfans then you need serious help. For starters I’d suggest coming out of the parents basement and talking to real women in person instead of only from behind a computer screen.

There’s real life and there’s the internet. They are not the same.

What freaking hypocritical and arrogant comment to make on a porn forum; I hate that shit when people unnecessarily attack someone and come with the „talk to real women“ line.

Also, just because this girl doesn’t perform actual „sex“ acts on camera, doesnt make her not a sex worker. Sure, if it makes you happy we could call her a erotic model. She doesn’t even fit the nude model criteria since she hasn’t done full nudity like playboy models.

 

[PhilipIrvine]

What freaking hypocritical and arrogant comment to make on a porn forum; I hate that shit when people unnecessarily attack someone and come with the „talk to real women“ line.

Also, just because this girl doesn’t perform actual „sex“ acts on camera, doesnt make her not a sex worker. Sure, if it makes you happy we could call her a erotic model. She doesn’t even fit the nude model criteria since she hasn’t done full nudity like playboy models.

well if you hate that line then OMG let me cry and go into hiding... get over it

your other comment is absolutely hilarious... on the one hand you suggest she is still a sex worker, then admit that the stuff she does isn't even at playboy levels... so which is it? is she a full-on sex worker to be considered with escorts or is she below playboy model level? can't be both

not getting into this whole back-and-forth debate again, i've said my piece and it was over with the other day, don't agree with my views? cool. Don't like something I've said? too bad, ignore me...

have a nice day

 

[Myusernameisusername]

well if you hate that line then OMG let me cry and go into hiding... get over it

your other comment is absolutely hilarious... on the one hand you suggest she is still a sex worker, then admit that the stuff she does isn't even at playboy levels... so which is it? is she a full-on sex worker to be considered with escorts or is she below playboy model level? can't be both

not getting into this whole back-and-forth debate again, i've said my piece and it was over with the other day, don't agree with my views? cool. Don't like something I've said? too bad, ignore me...

have a nice day

My point is that as a OnlyFans creator/Model she will generally have to live with the stigma of being a Sex worker even if she maybe in reality doesnt fit the actual definition of a sex worker. She’s known for being an OF model. Which the general public associates with sex work mostly.

So I am not disagreeing with you too much Actually.

Have a nice day as well!

 

[Chicogrande789]

To change the subject, does anyone get in a fantasy way like a blacked/blacked raw vibe from Sophie? I think that would be simply perfection

 

[FhantomRider]

when is she gonna show her fkin tits bro wtf its been more than a year

 

[ns8660]

when is she gonna show her fkin tits bro wtf its been more than a year

Year ?? For someone who's been following her since boutinela days it's been eternity my pal

 

[ariana69]

Is this Sophie?

Can anyone tell if it's been posted here in higher/or original res?
It's so hot.

 

[Whocares3]

Is this Sophie?

Can anyone tell if it's been posted here in higher/or original res?
It's so hot.

I have absolutely no idea who this chick is. I had to do a reverse image search to even find out who she is and it lead me here. If iam going to spend my money that I work hard for it better be something that I can get off to, have fun with, or something that I absolutely need so if it doesn't fit in those categories iam cool. She's a beautiful girl but iam not going to give her my money just for being beautiful which is what most men should be saying but theirs to many simps in this world for that to be even remotely realistic. I saw a comment about Tessa fowler saying that she said it was horrible being an online sex symbol but that's where most of her money comes from and her sisters been fucking on camera for years so you can't really listen to that. If being a sex worker is so bad why are their all these guys out here legit making these girls millionaires?

 

[Pete Wisdom]

I have absolutely no idea who this chick is. I had to do a reverse image search to even find out who she is and it lead me here. If iam going to spend my money that I work hard for it better be something that I can get off to, have fun with, or something that I absolutely need so if it doesn't fit in those categories iam cool. She's a beautiful girl but iam not going to give her my money just for being beautiful which is what most men should be saying but theirs to many simps in this world for that to be even remotely realistic. I saw a comment about Tessa fowler saying that she said it was horrible being an online sex symbol but that's where most of her money comes from and her sisters been fucking on camera for years so you can't really listen to that. If being a sex worker is so bad why are their all these guys out here legit making these girls millionaires?

There's a fair share of these girls are just doing sex work for the money and they don't want deal with the fame (the offline, real life fame) and consequences that comes with it. They are plenty of regular people who don't like jobs they are but they still do it for whatever reason.

The contempt that many female content creators have for their subs and and vice versa will always be an interesting paradox.

 

[1dwts1]

her editing out her nipples in see-through clothes are getting worse and worse