OF never refunds shit except for blatant payment and non-delivery. If reports start piling up they MAYBE start giving the agency that writes the captions a talking to but that's where it ends.
Going to love it when the world goes apoclaypse now and women like sophie get put in their place by the dregs of society. It will be quite fitting.
yeah, OF literally has zero incentive to refund ANYTHING
in fact, they are in on the scam. It makes zero business sense to crack down on misleading captions.
The best you can hope for is for some low-level employee who hates their job to refund your money
i've gotten a few refunds from them over the years... lets say 4 out of like 120 reports i've sent in. All for very low amounts, anything over $100 they ignore the request. And it has to be a blatant, flat-out, lie in the caption.
such as: you're actually going to see my pussy babe and then the model keeps her granny panties on throughout the entire video
such as: you're actually going to see my pussy babe and then the model keeps her granny panties on throughout the entire video
I'm just throwing a number out there, man. It wasn't meant to be taken literally hence the "like" before the number
been on OF off and on for like 7 years and followed 20-25 women over that time. Lots of content bought. Lots of content lied about. Lots of content that didn't come close to the expectations.
oh ok ok i feel you. the one and only time i reported to them was when i bought a girl's OF on sale for $6 and the next month they took $20 out of my account because I forgot to unsubscribe, and they didn't even send me an alert or anything. didn't get a refund.
Sophie is a beautiful woman that has figured out how to make money selling media of her beautiful body in various teasey ways.
I see no crime in that, certainly nothing that deserves what you're wishing for.
Like, chill the fuck out, guys.
yeah I mean if you forget to cancel your monthly subscription that's on you lol
not being a jerk, but many models run promotions like 75% off for first 30 days then it returns to normal monthly price so you got 30 days to cancel your subscription to avoid the full monthly fee
I am all for women making the most money they can off their bodies if they have the looks and bodies that people are into enough to warrant paying for but that's not the issue we are discussing here.
I think what the vast majority of us are getting at is simply be honest and straightforward about the type of content we are purchasing. I love the phrase "Don't piss on my shoes then tell me it's raining"... it applies here.
Don't tease you'll be showing a nipple then it's MAYBE visible for 1 second of a 2-minute video and due to the angle you're turned at, it very well could be just her finger/thumb...
Just be honest and let people decide if they want to pay based on the truth of what's being sold. No other business runs this way. You don't go into the liquor store in search of beer for the night and the box says "enough to get you drunk... $18" it says the exact amount of cans/bottles you're getting for your money.
The thing about Sophie Mudd is just imagine how popular she would be now if she had gone the Tessa Fowler path instead of teasing and showed her boobs off from day one. She would probably be one of the most popular models of the past decade and have people eating out of her hand but her being strangely prudish and not showing anything in a time when a lot of models do nudity has left a lot of people disappointed with her. She is kinda like the Jennifer Love Hewitt of internet modelling in the 2020s. Could have been great if she only showed her tits. 🤣
Yeah, okay, her "copywriting", or that of her online staff person, is cheap and sensational, analogous to a circus carney or something. Oh well. I mean, "fool me once, shame on you, full me twice, shame on me," right?
We should all be familiar with these very nonthreatening tricks by now. We know Sophie. We've seen her live stuff and know her limits and what she's comfortable with. She keeps doing this stuff because a) doing harder stuff can come back to destroy a person's life down the line (read Bree Olson's tearful warnings on that subject) and b) people will keep giving her money for similar content because she's just that fucking hot.
We should all be familiar with these very nonthreatening tricks by now. We know Sophie. We've seen her live stuff and know her limits and what she's comfortable with. She keeps doing this stuff because a) doing harder stuff can come back to destroy a person's life down the line (read Bree Olson's tearful warnings on that subject) and b) people will keep giving her money for similar content because she's just that fucking hot.
Tessa has talked about how horrible it was, on a personal level, being an online sex persona. Also, a lot of her diehard fans did not want her to get dirtier, so there's lots of pulling in different directions. It must be a complicated issue for these models and one that is exacerbated by how fucking weird and creepy dudes on the internet can be.
Yeah. You bring up some good points and I can see why a lot of these girls don't want to go down the hardcore path because there is a big difference between being a model and a porn star but when it comes to going dirty just how dirty is showing your tits? I mean you have got popular Actresses like Angelina Jolie, Julianne Moore, Kate Winslet, Emma Stone, Jennifer Lawrence to newer names like Sydney Sweeney that have shown their tits off a whole bunch of times and it is pretty common nowadays for women especially models to do it. It is her body and her choice and I respect that but it is just seems strange she is so against showing them when so many others do it. I feel if she just done that she would make a lot of people's day and nobody would be complaining about her.
😅 you're saying this like she doesn't have almost 3M followers on IG. i don't think the "tessa fowler path" would've been ideal for sophie, considering her social status and the fact that she's already making millions off OF doing what she's comfortable with.
remember guys, sophie isn't a girl that was desperate for money. this is an already rich girl, from a rich family, with a rich boyfriend who's getting even richer with onlyfans. if OF (and the hype around OF) didn't exist, you most likely would never have seen anything even close to a nude of her. she'd just be doing straight modelling, taking on small acting roles or writing a novel or something.
That's true but then the same can be said about Corinna Kopf who is more popular than Sophie and was in a position where she never had to show her tits off and could have glided by on what she was already doing but she chose to do it and there are many names more popular than Sophie that have done it too. That's why Sophie Mudd just feels like the odd duckling here. Also if not for OF I am not sure if anybody would have even heard of Sophie. I think a lot of these models would have gone nude for mags like Playboy if they had tried to become models during the 90s and 00s because there wasn't much else for them back then.
How I see Sophie situation is that she is really trying to hold on the anticipation of her getting nude, and making as much as possible, in the end if she will show it all or retire, I guess we will find out in max 2 years.
gravity is def starting to get the best of her, i predict she'll put on another 15lbs, go into baby fever mode, get knocked up, and start making nn preggo content within the next 1-3 years
She will never show anything. Come on, everyone already knows this. It's been over 2 years and the most we've seen is a finger pretending to be a nipple. I think that the kind of content she makes detestable and I don't see any other reason for her to do this other than to make fun of whoever is buying it.
Last edited: