Sorry, I couldn't get through the whole text. But regarding your example with the car service, I will comment. When you give your car to a car repair shop, then there is already an agreement between you and the car service with the rights and obligations of both parties. And infringement or non-compliance with them is punishable up to criminal liability. And the car service actually has to and is obliged to provide you with the service you paid for. When you pay for the subscription of such a model to OF, then only she has obligations to this plotform, and on your part everything is voluntary and without claims. If you don't like the content, then you're just looking for what you need. And if you voluntarily brought money to a person, where only her desire to earn is a guarantee, then what's the point of angry comments? You just stop paying and she will immediately think about it when at the beginning of the month she receives not $ 20,000, but $ 500. I wrote about the sums figuratively. But this is my opinion on this matter.
Unlike yourself, I am able to read more than half a page of text, so I have read and then reread your comment in an attempt to understand what it is you are trying to say. I seriously read, "If you don't like the content, then you're just looking for what you need" like ten times, and I still can't make heads or tails of it. I think overall, you mean to say that, "OF isn't like real businesses, so kick stones, bruh." I understood the last thing though; I agree that taking future profits out of her pocket is a good thing, since if you actually read my post, you would already know that is also my position on the matter. I only wish people were more vocal about their problems with her bullshit, since the voices of dissenters are drowned out by the cacophony of simp white-knights.
I will make it simple, I have a car, I take it to a repair shop, if they fail to repair it, they will not get paid.
For Maimy you already pay her before the month start, and you can't be sure if you would get what she promises for subscription, or you might get nothing for the month you already paid for.
I don't see a correlation between the two examples.
That is by no means what I wrote. I was stipulating a hypothetical of which most adults have experienced a version of in real life. To summarize: I have a car, I take it to the repair shop, they attempt to fix it, then charge me for the repairs. I cannot get my car back until I pay them. I cannot judge the veracity of their claims until I get my car back. So, when I do, and my car's problem persists/comes back 20 miles down the road, I am left with a choice: eat shit and die, or get my fucking money back. Please don't make me explain this again. It is incredibly simple. The correlation between Mechanic and Mai exists in that you have paid for either service before you know that the desired effect has been accomplished. Your lack of pattern recognition is mind-boggling.
Sure, if you're communicating the reasons in a civilised manner and then leaving, there's no issue and not something that should be avoided entirely. However, when the only thing that gets said is that she's a slag and worthless, I don't see the point. It's not constructive, and it's not healthy to harbor such emotions to the extent that you have to share them online - and especially to the person you're mad at for not delivering due to personal stress. I also don't think it's proper to discount an entire person if they make a mistake once, in your case the hypothetical cute girl mechanic, and they try to fix it once their attention has been brought to the issue. Should the problem be repeated several times over, especially if there's a promise for a service that doesn't get delivered to an agreeable level, then there's an issue that should absolutely be shared with others. What people tend to forget is that there really isn't a promise from Maimy's side to deliver more content, though it's implied. Certainly so with her continually posting schedules and plans to make it seem like things are happening. I've more than once been annoyed at that type of behavior, but at the end of the day, it's not promised.
I can also provide two anecdotal, or well one, and then another hypothethical one, stories.
I was a very angry child and very often got into fights and other things. A few times things got very far, to the point where not just teachers were involved. I used objects to my advantage, I used my height and strength (tallest in my class by several cms), I hurled insults, I was mad and angry. People were afraid. I did all those things, and what happened? People were, as I mentioned, afraid. Did that bring me respect? No, quite the opposite. People walked on their tippy toes not to anger me, since very innocuous things could provoke me into rage, people tended to avoid me since they were afraid rather than respected me. It wasn't just anger at random things, however, it was also anger towards genuine injustice - not just towards myself. I often got mad at other's behalf and stood up to the one doing the wronging, but did that bring respect from the person who I "protected"? No, they got afraid. Is it a 1to1 compared to your story of standing up to yourself? No, but it's a story about how anger and lashing out isn't always the answer.
The second one is hypothetical. You mention your dialogue with the receptionist and how you eventually worked things out. You uttered your grievance towards the man in a civilised manner, and the issue was resolved. How would the conversation have gone if, instead of being articulate and proper, you cussed him out and threw a fit of rage? I very much doubt the issue would've been solved as smoothly, if at all.
Truth is most often preferred, but there are times where I disagree with your philosophy of always telling the absolute truth. Things that hurt another, without any benefit to anybody, is pointless. Things such as dementia patients not remembering certain things and reminding them over and over, and them getting sad every time. Very specific case, however, there are lots of other cases where the same principle can be applied. I won't try to come up with more scenarios, but my argument is obvious. I do agree that it's reprehensible for e-girls to pretend that people have a shot, and sad for those who believe it. I don't think thanking somebody for a donation, even when they don't need it, is absurd. Most people, hopefully, aren't too attached and can escape into the fantasy only for a little bit, and aren't naïve enough to ignore her BF and the "story" texts she sometimes posts on her OF and pretend it's all real. I also believe there's nothing wrong with her withholding information, since not everything has to be shared (something she could learn a bit of - think plans etc.). Worth mentioning is that this type of content, anything related to OF and "personal" content, is probably not very healthy for anybody.
I can't tell whether you are blatantly trying to straw man my post, or just responding to something I didn't say because you assume people are calling her a worthless slag. I'm going to assume the latter, since your personal anecdote differs from my own in every conceivable way. Being an angry asshole as a kid is in no way akin to standing up to a bully. You were the bully in your own story; can't you see that? Also, calling a grown man a "receptionist" would have drawn his ire way more than anything else I can think of to say. He probably would have thrown a torque wrench at my head. And the dementia analogy, what the fuck? Seriously? Are you really likening horny, lonely idiots to dementia sufferers, and my truth-telling stance to that of basically pulling an old person's wheelchair out from under them? Give your head a fucking shake dude. I take it back; you are absolutely blatantly trying to straw man me at every turn. It would be laughable if it wasn't so sad.
Also, my point isn't that her thanking people for donations is absurd (the manner in which she does is absurd; canned responses and feigned enthusiasm), but the fact that people are literally giving money away to people with more money than them! "Donating" has never, and should never, be the term used for this. It is reserved for the giving of what you have to those with less than you; an act of altruism. Not tipping some bitch on the internet so that she'll put on her NPC voice and say your username. Your last few sentences, I agree with, mostly. You still can't bring yourself to call him her husband, though, can you? Still with the BF shit. I wonder, if I were to show you their marriage license, plain as day, what mental gymnastics would your mind do to convince you that it's a fake?
Lastly, the whole, "...in your case the hypothetical cute girl mechanic, and they try to fix it once their attention has been brought to the issue. Should the problem be repeated several times over, especially if there's a promise for a service that doesn't get delivered to an agreeable level, then there's an issue that should absolutely be shared with others." You are literally describing Mai here, but because you think you're talking about a hypothetical mechanic, you can say it without qualm. Yet, if asked to substitute her name in, you can't bring yourself to do it. Do you see it? In therapy, if I were a competent clinician, you would be having a minor breakthrough right now. I think you're hung up on the "implied" vs. "promised" thing. Don't you see that you made that rule up? Never, in the history of ever, has a mechanic or any customer service employee offered a fucking pinky promise when dealing with the public. Money, in exchange for goods/services is about as established an implied agreement as anything, ever. No promises needed. Also, contracts: the legal version of a promise, get rescinded all the fucking time! Actions speak louder than words, implied or promised. And please stop telling yourself and others that Onlyfans is a "donation-based subscription service, with no obligations offered or expected, in perpetuity, in the whole of the universe." or some such bullshit. They are a multi-billion-dollar company that must abide by all rules-of-trade as all other legal businesses. And just like a car repair shop, you can demand your money back, call the Better Business Bureau, or bitch in an online review. Stop being the bully, and start being the kid who stands up for himself, and if you still can't tell the difference, you seriously need to go to therapy. Like right now. Stop reading this and go make an appointment.
