• We have blocked access to our website from TOR nodes and a datacenter in France (some VPN connections to the country might be faulty) due to abusive behaviour. If things quiet down - they'll be enabled again in a few days/weeks.

Simp Chat MaimyNyan Parasocial Activity Thread

Sort by date Sort by reaction score
xutox19 said:
people who talk like this are the reason words lose their meaning and predators start to get less consequences.

you lick a mic and show your ass on the internet for money, equating that to rape when someone steals it is not the play dear. when you make lesser crimes equal to horrible, disgusting, dispicable acts, it diminishes the severity of those bad things.

stealing? yeah sure.
raping? nowhere near

stop with that shit
Click to expand...
i think she means that there’s a consensual relationship where a creator produces sexual content of themselves for paying clients. These creators aren’t doing this for free or for the public. So someone taking or pirating their sexual content is a type of non-consensual sexual exploitation.
 
fifilurks said:
Maybe 20% of this forum is shit posting. Obviously y’all care otherwise there wouldnt be 500 pages complaining over and over, you would of moved on ages ago. So yes, clearly y’all are mad.

And she should and DOES care about people non consensually STEALING her content bro get some brain cells. Every creator cares even just a little and we have every right to. You’re digitally raping us.
Click to expand...
Well I digitally have a lil pp so at least you won't feel much
 
xutox19 said:
people who talk like this are the reason words lose their meaning and predators start to get less consequences.

you lick a mic and show your ass on the internet for money, equating that to rape when someone steals it is not the play dear. when you make lesser crimes equal to horrible, disgusting, dispicable acts, it diminishes the severity of those bad things.

stealing? yeah sure.
raping? nowhere near

stop with that shit
Click to expand...
you are dismissing the potential psychological harm creators can experience from non-consensual nudity shared online. It's not as simple as pirating a movie. I shouldn't have to explain this, it's pretty easy to understand...
 
so0 said:
i think she means that there’s a consensual relationship where a creator produces sexual content of themselves for paying clients. These creators aren’t doing this for free or for the public. So someone taking or pirating their sexual content is a type of non-consensual sexual exploitation.
Click to expand...
But then couldn't it be argued that pirating shows and movies constitutes digital rape, pirating video games constitutes digital rape and pirating books is also digital rape. Usually the federal government does not go after piracy because there are so many others that take priority, namely going after terrorists, drug pushers, gun smugglers and others involved in nefarious activities. Most recent article I could find was them going after a site named Jetflicks https://www.cbsnews.com/news/five-men-convicted-running-unauthorized-streaming-site-jetflicks/

Words themselves have meaning and rape is one of the most unforgivable acts that can be heaped upon another, and if you look at the clearance rate for rape it's pretty low in my opinion. Realistically anyone that gets into the business of producing smut needs to think long and hard before doing so, the consequences are how others will judge you and how you'll always be perceived as less than if they know that about you.

Apologies for my rant, I came here to shitpost. I don't even know who the chick this thread is for is but the thread always shows up in latest posts.
 
fifilurks said:
you are dismissing the potential psychological harm creators can experience from non-consensual nudity shared online. It's not as simple as pirating a movie. I shouldn't have to explain this, it's pretty easy to understand...
Click to expand...
Why 100 grugs pay 1000 berries for Maimy boob when 1 Caesar pay 10 berries and draw Maimy boob on cave wall for other 99 grugs? :WeSmart:
Too smart to worry about consequences
 
Gaar2711 said:
I have already given here an example of Amouranth, which has a huge audience on twitch + is engaged in selling all parts of its body. And she mentioned more than once that "OF" is her main income. And as for Mai, she's just lazy and treats her fans like idiots who will pay anyway. Over the past year, the negativity has already outweighed the positive emotions towards her and her content. It smells like a divorce :) But I still hope for a miracle and a set :):peepoGiggles:
Click to expand...
Had. Scamouranths twitch audience has fully bottomed out. She gets like 2k IF she streams on twitch. Same with kick. She's basically nothing like she used to be
 
xXXsmutXXx said:
But then couldn't it be argued that pirating shows and movies constitutes digital rape, pirating video games constitutes digital rape and pirating books is also digital rape. Usually the federal government does not go after piracy because there are so many others that take priority, namely going after terrorists, drug pushers, gun smugglers and others involved in nefarious activities. Most recent article I could find was them going after a site named Jetflicks https://www.cbsnews.com/news/five-men-convicted-running-unauthorized-streaming-site-jetflicks/

Words themselves have meaning and rape is one of the most unforgivable acts that can be heaped upon another, and if you look at the clearance rate for rape it's pretty low in my opinion. Realistically anyone that gets into the business of producing smut needs to think long and hard before doing so, the consequences are how others will judge you and how you'll always be perceived as less than if they know that about you.

Apologies for my rant, I came here to shitpost. I don't even know who the chick this thread is for is but the thread always shows up in latest posts.
Click to expand...
I interpreted her as referring to “rape” meaning non-consensual sexual exploitation. Which is a different category from these other things you’re listing, like video games say. Obviously the content we’re talking about here is sexual content and sexual labor.

There’s a difference between whether something is legal vs moral/good, I think. If, hypothetically, something like stealing and murder are legal, does that make them good?
 
fifilurks said:
Maybe 20% of this forum is shit posting. Obviously y’all care otherwise there wouldnt be 500 pages complaining over and over, you would of moved on ages ago. So yes, clearly y’all are mad.

And she should and DOES care about people non consensually STEALING her content bro get some brain cells. Every creator cares even just a little and we have every right to. You’re digitally raping us.
Click to expand...
"Us"? You got something to share with the group kiddo?
 
so0 said:
I interpreted her as referring to “rape” meaning non-consensual sexual exploitation. Which is a different category from these other things you’re listing, like video games say. Obviously the content we’re talking about here is sexual content and sexual labor.

There’s a difference between whether something is legal vs moral/good, I think. If, hypothetically, something like stealing and murder are legal, does that make them good?
Click to expand...
Is porn not considered entertainment? I listed those other things alongside because cause smut is just entertainment to me. If I'm being honest there's a lot of onlyfans creators that scam so I always check here before hand to see if their content is worth it. I know a lot of individuals have some moral hangups about sex so any conversation involving it tends to devolve into knee jerk reactions.

As for the second part a real life example of something similar would be bestiality being legal in the sate of West Virginia. Does it being legal in that state make it good? I think it's clear the answer is no, just because something is legal does not make it moral or good.
 
fifilurks said:
You’re digitally raping us.
Click to expand...
Dear god, what a shameful and stupid take. If you are content creators, than stealing your content is a copyright infringiment, plain piracy, and the only damage is done to the creators pocket. If you wanna play the “sexual act” card, than you are a digital prostitute and its still just a monetary damage. No one is cohorting you into making the sexual act, you are offering it as a service, and the only problem is that some clients arent paying. Kind of having sex with a prostitute and paying with a fundless check. To compare it to a crime wich robs you of your choice and dignity and most often than not leave the victims devastated phisically and emotionally its just… Be better.
 
fifilurks said:
you are dismissing the potential psychological harm creators can experience from non-consensual nudity shared online. It's not as simple as pirating a movie. I shouldn't have to explain this, it's pretty easy to understand...
Click to expand...
the difference here is the creators are consenting to creating and publicizing nudity. you put out nude content thats publically available for purchase, then claim that you are traumatized that someone looked at it whether they paid or not. the creator KNOWS they are making it, and KNOWS that people will look at it, the only upsetting situation here is that they dont get paid as much as they wanted. that is not sexual exploitation, thats not revenge porn, that is not rape.

this is the same type of equating as "if you like short women youre a ped"
it devalues the word and makes it have less impact since its overused for useless examples.

just admit it for what it is, you dont like that your content is pirated. if you have actual serious psychological issues because of that, then you should get out of the business
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom