Manyvids take 40% commission instead of 20.
Onlyfans also has way more traffic and earning potential than every other site out there.
Discussion Agencies are ruining OF for me...
- Thread starter xyz001
- Start date
Manyvids take 40% commission instead of 20.
Onlyfans also has way more traffic and earning potential than every other site out there.
oraneknight
Bathwater Drinker
- Sep 4, 2022
- 105
- 10,540
manyvids is also 20% apparently unless they changed it in the last 2 years. either way as a consumer its not my job to care about how much money they could make its just about what's convenient and priced fairly.
ManyVids Vs Clips4Sale: What is the Difference Between The Two
Selling your custom videos on ManyVids Vs Clips4Sale, what is the difference between the two?
Horny4Tits
Interracial Porn Connoisseur
- Jun 1, 2023
- 226
- 12,885
ManyVids still takes a 40% cut for video store sales (creators get 60%)
Store Items would be things like physical photos, lingerie, DVDs, etc
Store Items would be things like physical photos, lingerie, DVDs, etc
manyvids is also 20% apparently unless they changed it in the last 2 years. either way as a consumer its not my job to care about how much money they could make its just about what's convenient and priced fairly.
ManyVids Vs Clips4Sale: What is the Difference Between The Two
Selling your custom videos on ManyVids Vs Clips4Sale, what is the difference between the two?medium.com
well yes, the benefit of clip sites is they have internal discoverability like search engines, categories, top performer lists so it makes it easy for customers to find your store. Whereas Onlyfans has no discoverability and the onus is on the creator to drive traffic. Which is why paying an extra 20% stings but isn't for nothing.
I've been thinking about this a bit lately. For us Americans, I wonder if an organized effort to make complaints to the FTC would do anything.
reportfraud.ftc.gov
After all, it's wire fraud that these creators, agencies, and chatters are engaged in which is a federal crime.
Report Fraud
Protect your community by reporting fraud, scams, and bad business practices
After all, it's wire fraud that these creators, agencies, and chatters are engaged in which is a federal crime.
mustardsalad
Tier 1 Sub
- Aug 4, 2024
- 0
- 109
Another gripe: "Babe, you still there?" 
No. No, I'm not. I left when you kept trying to push for a sexting session that I'm not in the mood for, instead of you asking me why I subbed/what I'm looking for.
No. No, I'm not. I left when you kept trying to push for a sexting session that I'm not in the mood for, instead of you asking me why I subbed/what I'm looking for.And depending on the performer, that sexting session might consist of 4-5 pre-recorded videos, each one costing 2-3 times the price of the previous one.Another gripe: "Babe, you still there?"
Something else that's gotten me suspicious is performers who promise some awesome content, but ask for your snapchat in order to send it. I've been following mommy_lust for a long time, and recently, whoever is running her other page has been teasing BG content. However, "she" says it's "too private" for OF, and do I have snapchat. Truth be told, I don't have one, but even if I did, why would that be necessary? And the one time she suggested having a BG vid, ending with her getting cummed on, I paid for it, only to find that it was her using two dildos and obvious fake cum. The only reason I still follow her (although I haven't bought anything since) is because on another board, a few people claimed that she had a few BG vids that she did on a camming site, and (like a few people mentioned already), I'm sticking around waiting for that one video I'd most like to see.
Last edited:
Some performers will use snapchat to get around OF needing other people in the vids/pics to be approved or have releases signed. I've seen this a few times especially if someone made content a long time ago with someone they aren't still talking to. Don't know how long ago it was but OF made a rule change where anyone in the vids/pics needs to sign a release and some creators at the time lost a lot of content
Interesting. I never thought of it that way. Still, what's the point - I'd be paying a lot of $$ for something I wouldn't even be able to save. Just not worth it.
Report her because it's against tos to distribute content via other platforms
oraneknight
Bathwater Drinker
- Sep 4, 2022
- 105
- 10,540
i wonder how strongly they enforce that since one person i follow sends out google drive links to everything posted in a month at the end of the month and i am definitely not trying to stop that.
That's 100% against tos. Does she use a URL shortener?
All accounts get audited every now and then, will flag old videos in the process and scan messages for banned words
But tbh in my experience it's actually pretty hard to get banned from OF.
I've reported someone who was just taking random pictures of people from the internet to pad out his page, some of whom were legit porn stars who had no idea they were being uploaded. That should be instant ban but nothing happened.
Simpwrangler
Bathwater Drinker
- Jul 17, 2024
- 276
- 14,488
I have to roll my eyes at sexting sessions at this point. It always starts off innocently enough with a sexy clip at $10-$15. Then each locked message gets progressively more expensive until they have you by the balls and are asking you for $75-150 for a 2 minute clip...and I have to suddenly get my rapidly deflating boner under control as I explain to them, "sorry, but hell. no."
oraneknight
Bathwater Drinker
- Sep 4, 2022
- 105
- 10,540
url shortener for one link and then sends a different link to people's email but i guess she stays under the radar. of course the accounts making tons of money won't ever get banned unless it starts costing them more than they make.
That's just standard sexting strategy. It's called the drip method
capnfaphn20
Bathwater Drinker
- Aug 6, 2022
- 30
- 3,526
100% this. I tend to get a lot of content through other means since OF has such a hard line now, but it makes it easier for the girl to send things that would have to go through all the steps that didnt exist before. Or she had strikes against her page and doesnt want to risk getting anymore regardless of what it is.
However, in the OPs situation, it sounds like they are just scamming you by having you go through an outside platform and you have no protection since they are doing it outside of OF. Yes, you can report them and OF will look into it, but OF doesnt just ban someone on single offenses. There is this arbitrary 3 strike rule that gets inconsistently enforced, but they look into what the nature of the complaint is, and if its serious enough, they add up where they cant post anymore or will outright be banned. Most of the time they just remove the content or links, but if you are getting scammed like that, I would be reporting it because fuck girls that do that shit.
they really expect for you to get so horny you wouldnt be able to say no.
Would you believe it's possible to cheat the tagging system by tagging someone else in the video.
I know a lot of creators do this if they don't have a release form. They also do it if one of their regular co-performers has been banned.
Some things are insta- account nuke - like arranging real life meets on the platform.
If you read the insane creatorsadvice or onlyfansadvice subreddits then nearly everyone who complains they got banned for no reason ends up revealing that they actually did a serious breach of the rules - by arranging real life meets, taking off platform payments etc.
I'm fairly certain that the more money you make the less likely it is you'll get banned but not impossible.
As I referred to earlier - a promo account (which itself is technically against the rules) was uploading random content he pulled from the internet, including images of other OF creators. That should be an insta nuke imo because he is both committing copyright theft and uploading without consent.
Some creator made a big deal months ago about how OF discriminates against sex workers because she was using banned words like "schoolboy" etc - clearly a breach of the rules.
She then said she would quit OF and stopped uploading new content - but has kept the page up and still logs in to presumably sell PPV. Her profile bio says "No longer updating with new content after 24th August 2024, because OF has become unfriendly towards fetish content. My new fan page platform is updating 2x daily; check my Twitter" That is directing people to her new fansite and criticising OF and should be a violation but both the profile and the page remain active
capnfaphn20
Bathwater Drinker
- Aug 6, 2022
- 30
- 3,526
There are some things that are hard no's on OF, like arranging to meet, FAF or escorting. That shit will get your account shut down so fast. There were some girls that when OF was newer, they had all of their socials linked including their hooker websites, and OF eventually banned all of them
.I cant vouch for the way they enforce things, but it comes in waves. It usually happens around a TOS update from what I have seen. I also was told, but I would only take it with a grain of salt, that their monitoring of content is done through some primary AI base, so its not that good. Example is a girl that uploaded one of those videos where she was in it herself, but it was 2 videos mirrored in some way so its just her appearing more than once side by side. The system flagged it and she had her account suspended temporarily, and when she uploaded it again, the system wouldnt approve it. It took more than a month to get in contact with someone directly on OF to view it and approve it because her account is solo and has no other collabed vids either.
The banned words list is not hard to go around since agencies use that all the time, but you cant even send a message or write something that has banned words in it because it has a popup telling you something you are saying isnt allowed, but they dont highlight it either. Its stupid.
You are allowed to link other social medias, but using OF to process payments for other content sent outside of OF is a big no, but you have to be utterly stupid to be talking like that in messages anyway on both sides. They could technically ban her for trying to promote her content to another site, but ever since OF shot itself in the foot with the first purge, they havent been as twitchy about pulling the trigger on simple statements like that.
It all is selectively enforced though because look how they let agencies run rampant with scams and deception, no matter how much you report them for anything. They must be bringing in enough to look the other way, but agencies are also good at getting people to fall for their tactics that arent technically against the TOS. This way the only way refunds are issued is if they send content that is not correct, or so different than what was said. The rest is buyers remorse.