It doesn’t, because the analogy is terrible.
If an escort shows up with a dick that one didn’t expect to be there, then that materially affects one’s experience, because that’s a physical object in a physical encounter.
If you get a sext that says, “look at how hard my nipples are for your cock, big boy 😘” with a picture of the model’s hard nipples attached, then the experience is materially THE EXACT SAME from your end, as long as you never know who is sending it. In all cases, you’re getting the same text, and the same picture.
The only think that makes it different is the purely mental construct, the belief about who the message is from. What you’re recieving is the same. In neither case would the model take a look at your dick if you weren’t paying, nor do you know if their nipples are hard in the pic because of you (they aren’t), or because they’re watching a Henry Cavil movie or because they just got done fooling around with the real life partner.
If you never know—which you can’t unless you have video of the model sending every individual message—then your mind would never know the difference. That’s not at all the case with a physical escort, because it’s not a purely mental construct.
Cool. Stop paying them, and see if they answer the same—or ANY—questions.
No? Then it isn’t “genuine” by the way 99.99% of the world defines that word. Only someone who has no real-world baseline for genuine, non-paid interactions with women and has only sexted and/or talks with women they pay would disagree. They only entertain your questions because you’re paying, so that in-and-of-itself is the “pretending to care” about anything you have to say part.
