Every time I read someone say, “but I know I’m talking to {model}”, I immediately picture this on their wall:
…because, no, you don’t know.
Just because a model isn’t using the agency “template” of an extremely horny personality switch and constant pressure to buy PPVs…doesn’t mean you’re talking to the person.
Plenty of OF models use partners/assistants/friends/etc to answer DMs. A request for a video saying a particular name for “proof” can be forwarded to the actual person. The same way non-authors hire uncredited ghostwriters for books, OF models can get people who know them to answer messages on their behalf. I’m sure, like me, we all have friends we’ve texted with enough to be able to emulate their “style”—both writing and personality mannerisms—so it’d be the same for any model savvy enough to hire/enlist “help” that doesn’t obviously announce itself as “it’s a different person writing this”.
This is why I find calls to audit/regulate this particular aspect of the business proposition so impotent and DOA.
I’d like just one person here who thinks the, “I’m really talking to them” part should be policed to explain exactly how that auditing/regulation/policing would actually work in practice.
I understand dicks and brains want to believe the fantasy…but a bunch of easily spoofable context clues isn’t “proof” of anything, as much as the self-appointed Senior DM Analysts around here want to swear, “I can tell!” up and down.
Why aren’t the goods/content/photos/videos good enough for some of you when it comes to models? Why do you want/need to pretend you have some sort of “relationship” with them because you pay them to read your texts?
