So I’ll probably catch some heat for this one but I really hate a ton of tattoos on the performers. I admit it is kind of crazy, especially since I have a ton of ink too. I just don’t like it, especially on the female performers.
The dick does not run on logic, my friend.
I'm with you on tats. I can tolerate a few small ones around but sleeves and especially chest/boob tats are an instant boner killer. You don't let art school students touch up the Mona Lisa.
I'm with you and him too. I don't mind a few here and there, but large tattoos on the chest, neck, lower back, boobs, ass cheeks, and forehead often ruin it for me. Ideally, I prefer no tattoos at all although that's unrealistic. I am generally not bothered by it if it's not excessive or they are well done. There are exceptions though, like Taylor White where I think she pulls off the look very well. Unfortunately, she often rocks the trashy long nails which is a universal turn off for me. But again, I'm able to look past it in most cases if I really dig the model.
for me its not just really long nails, even a bit long nails I dislike. They dont have to be completely short like guys, but if it goes I think like maybe >2-3mm from the finger to me it starts being turn off?
I think its because few things. First it looks bad. But also girls cant use their hands comfortably, they have to be careful with their nails. They cant put fingers anywhere. And I keep thinking about dirt collecting under the nails?
whats hot tho is shorter nails with bright contrast nail polish like white, orange or yellow. I love that shit.
Example:
"i'll probably catch some heat"
you're like the 486230583265023740927042th person to complains about this
I have literally nothing to add. You and I are on the same page.
Long nails are, traditionally, a “flex” by women to signify “I am a woman of class and I don’t do labor for which these absurd nails would be an impediment” (I.e. clean, cook, laundry, you get the idea).
Which is funny to see on the trashiest of women while getting railroaded.
absolutely. even women irl with nice manicured hands like that will get my attention.
theres dudes out there into feet im like "nah bby lemme them digits"
I've got a ton:
When girls pull their panties to the side for dildo use instead of just taking them off.
When they don't get fully naked.
When they show too much ass and never turn around(not an ass guy).
When they don't show off their belly buttons (hiding them with shirts or high waisted pants, even if they're topless).
When they pretend to be ticklish but aren't and it's obvious.
Shitty, over the top acting.
B/G material. Why tf would I want to see someone who isn't me get laid?
When girls pull their panties to the side for dildo use instead of just taking them off.
When they don't get fully naked.
When they show too much ass and never turn around(not an ass guy).
When they don't show off their belly buttons (hiding them with shirts or high waisted pants, even if they're topless).
When they pretend to be ticklish but aren't and it's obvious.
Shitty, over the top acting.
B/G material. Why tf would I want to see someone who isn't me get laid?
I also prefer naked over clothed/partially clothed and face in frame for at least half of the vid. There's not much point if I cant see their face imo. Might as well be a scene with any other girl with a similar build
This last point is a bit alien to me since BG is practically a requirement for me. I'm not really imagining myself as the one fucking them. I'm more focusing on the girl and her reactions I suppose. Even if I wasn't fucking her myself, I'd like to imagine myself fucking her.
If I can't do it myself, seeing someone do it for me is the next best thing
Imagine seeing a video of a girl you had a huge crush on in the past and never asked out. You'd still nut to vids of her getting fucked, right?
I don't care about the dude. He's a tool and plays the role of a dildo and holds the girl in different positions as he handles her. Even better if they have chemistry and interact
Solo with dildo doesn't do it as much for me. It's not quite the same. It feels boring and she's not getting handled and there's less positions
There's no moments of intimacy, shyness, blushing, eye contact, kissing, etc.There are nude modeling sites where the commenters are strongly anti BG because it "ruins the purity of the girl/their mental image of the girl". They would be begging in the comments for the girls to not do BG. It would be fine if they wanted more solo/GG content but they basically gatekept BG for people who actually wanted to see it. I thought it was pretty strange
Plus the fact that you don't get the real money shot with a dildo. I like to see the girl get a facial at the end, and even though I know that even when a guy is involved, they are sometimes fake, there's still the illusion that it's real, which you don't get with a dildo.
Lucy Lawrence is one name who comes to mind as being like this, although I've heard lately she's gone back to being feminine in her videos.
There was one model I used to follow a few years back who was really cute, and had a few hot vids, but then suddenly she started letting all of her body hair grow, save for her head, which she shaved. She did a couple of b/g vids like this, but it just wasn't doing it for me, so I ended my subscription to her OF. A few months later, I came across her IG page, and she had visible facial hair, and the caption made it clear she was transitioning FTM. I completely lost interest and deleted all of her pics and vids - just couldn't look at her the same again.
Mikaela Lafuente is host as fuck her content sucks it mostly 5 to 10 second PG 10 or 11 level content and she does the same 3 poses in all her videos and images
She might top 5 hottest with the lamest content
These chicks need to show tits and pussy some never showing them will turn away people hoping to see them after 3 to 6 ans she never shows them they are not fans any more
She might top 5 hottest with the lamest content
These chicks need to show tits and pussy some never showing them will turn away people hoping to see them after 3 to 6 ans she never shows them they are not fans any more
A fairly simple rule of thumb: The hotter the chick, the lamer the content. That's why I don't spend hours searching the Instagram/Onlyfans/Twitch pages, you'll only be disappointed anyway. When I see a hot Instagram girl, the chances of seeing her naked or having hardcore sex are very slim.
The thing is, since I've never really been able to freely indulge myself in prime young pussy, seeing someone else claim ownership of it just isn't a turn on. It's some better-socialized, better-looking dude getting something I've never been able to have easily, for free, while I have to pay for it or scour forums like this to even experience it on a screen. I wish I could see the guy as just a "tool" and a dildo and focus on the girl and her reactions, but it's just not my thing. All I see is something I don't have. When the girl is alone, it's easy to self-insert. But yes, I imagine the reactions are more genuine and more intense and just better overall when the girl is interacting with a dude she's actually into. But since I haven't had a whole lot of that in my life, especially from girls hot enough to gain followings for lewdness or porn, it's just painful. There are occasional exceptions, but 9 times out of 10 that's how it is.
And when the girl is obviously acting with the over the top moans and "Oh GaaWD I'm gOnna cuM!" bullshit, that's just absurd, I don't understand how anyone could get hard to that.
I'm not even really into traditional "fucking" porn anyway. Most of the stuff I'm into is very niche and very specific, it's more about the model submitting in a very specific way.
Your explanation makes sense, tho. It's interesting to have someone spell it out.