The only thing that really pisses me off was that she actually baited the whole thing. She made a announcement that she was going to be making the actual announcement on Amouranth’s stream only for it to a OF with the content being a copy & past from her fansly. She made the OF announcement like she hasn’t been spreading her ass cheeks on Fansly for months. Literally pointless
Looking at it through a lens where the intentions were innocent or in the name of good business, a known/famous content creator was giving another well-known but not as famous content creator a leg up by using a high profile event like that other known/famous content creator's stream to plug an announcement for their debut on a platform which they'll both be on. For casual observers and the simp faithful, that's how it'll come across. But for people that can see past bullshit and know the hustles of the content creators in question, you and me are going to be part of that crew.
People need to not be assholes about the wanting to see her nude part, but ESP isn't really a thing so what do you do? Her streamer buddy Amo has done as much even if there's trickiness in the way she pulls it off. Lisa/Peachy has posed somewhat nude in the past as evidenced by those old pictures (which I had seen in the past, nice to see them here for posterity's sake). She's not going to be able to transform OF and how it's perceived by setting hard limits on what she'll ever do on the platform. She's made ultra-suggestive material up to this point which does make it seem like a gyp that the transition to full-er nudity is off the table. OF doesn't have a nudity-required clause when you become a creator on the site, I'm sure, but if you're a holdout and you're charging prices for bikini pics or twerk videos that seem like rip-offs, you gotta set yourself apart from your competition or your simp army won't grow past a certain point. Fortunately, since an attractive woman's nude body generally is more appealing as opposed to seeing them clothed or semi-clothed on a regular basis, that's a really easy transition to make after a while if you can commit to it.
The only types of modeling where I could defend a model's right to set hard limits on what they are willing/not willing to show would be amateur/freelance/pro/supermodel-tier models that are actually getting paid for their gigs and don't have a specific publication or media outlet where their content is exclusively published. If you're a model for Playboy or Hustler, you're probably not going to go very far if all you're going to do is suggestive poses and wear a bikini that occasionally gets adjusted a little bit to show more of the breast or the pelvis. That stuff belongs in GQ or Maxim. Celebrities have posed for Playboy but to different degrees of showing skin. Someone like Stacey Dash, Lisa Rinna or Lindsay Lohan went pretty far even for being so-called "celebrities". Then you have Maren Morris who couldn't be bothered to show a nipple. Granted, none of these celebrities are models full-time and likely have different priorities regarding why they won't show a certain amount. But I can defend them because they're part-time modeling for something like Playboy even if I feel disappointed by the content.
On the other hand, Lisa/Peachy models as a primary gig for OF and Fansly even if she cosplays and streams about as prolifically. And she's modeling on those two sites that are known for porn and nude modeling. She's not anyone's role model or able to argue that she's trying to set a good example for other creators that branch out. Whatever her motives - comfort level, morals, politics (feminism), not upsetting her husband, so on - it is absolutely baiting by now and I have to set my expectations really low each time I get a notification that her OF thread has a new post knowing how consistently tame her stuff has been for the longest time.