She said something about doing nudes recently like she's cool about doing them but they have to be "her idea." If you ask her to do them, she'll take offense. The weirdest part is that she said the same is true with her personal life, that an ex had asked her to send him nude selfies and she got really pissed off because it was his idea, but that she was fine with sending them if it had been her idea. She is a head case though, so I guess it's not that surprising.
I've noticed this a lot these days. Women are all about being sexy and showing off but God forbid a man ever like it or ask for it
She ain't dumb, she plays tough on.the nude requests but knows that a big size of her audience would pay for it. The raunchiness of her photoset advertisement tweets is a way to increase demand. I still think she is getting more and more explicit.Moving at the speed of a snail and with some setbacks but her showing most of her nipple would never have happened when she started her fanhouse.
There's a lot of truth to what you're saying, but (ya'll can correct me if I'm wrong), her two most explicit sets (at least imo), the Polaroid set and the partial nude ballerina pics were both done back when she when was still with fanhouse, just never posted. The corset set, which is okay imo (I only really like it because that's also when she shot the video with the apple), is also from fanhouse, but again, never posted. So as far as new stuff goes, I don't know that she's getting more explicit. I can only tell you that most of the sets I've seen look like vanity projects, sets that make her happy to shoot because she likes playing dressup but that no one in their right mind would actually pay to see.
Yeah, film grain doesn't remove detail. It actually often creates the impression of greater detail because it adds sharpness. Look at any 4k movie with film grain (like The Batman from 2022).
Assuming you mean the Audrey Hepburn tribute, I watched part of a livestream where she talked about it. She paid a professional photographer, paid for studio fees, wardrobe, etc, and took about 1500 photos... because she wanted to look like Audrey Hepburn from, "Breakfast at Tiffany's." Not joking. That's why I called it and most of what she does vanity projects, because there's no market for any of it. At least she had enough sense to take a few sexy pics that day, but with the crappy resolution (which may be an attempt to re-create the 60's look of the original Audrey photos), you can't see much. Which is also nicely convenient..
You're probably right but I did say the same thing about the apple video and it ended up being a lot better than that.
