Simp Chat Laurenkimripley - Discussion Thread
- Thread starter DummyProfile
- Start date
She never went any further than showing boobs. So no. She once claimed that there videos of her fucking dudes on her phone though.
That probably explains the latest 30 day free trial. Gotta keep those numbers up somehow.
Yeah theres also a new bit in her description that wasn't there before.
"This is a classy page, please respect that."
BOOOO!
God her content is so boring 😂 i honestly feel for the heroes that pay for it and share on here, cuz that shit is vanilla as fuck.
What else would you expect from someone who was moderately well-known (Youtube) transitioning into sex work? There's a stigma she's probably trying to avoid in being seen as just that - a sex worker - and by only showing her tits/ass, she's can gaslight people into thinking she's using Onlyfans for modeling.
Admittedly, I don't subscribe to anyone on Onlyfans/Fansly/elsewhere and I don't pay attention to too many "creators" on those platforms, so my frame of reference is limited in scope - but I'm hard-pressed to identify/name a "creator" famous through a safer platform who made a giant leap into pornographic content within the first year of their debut on a platform known for porn. Meg Turney, Jessica Nigri, Amouranth, Christina Khalil, Natalie Roush - each of these "creators"/influencers are still putting hard limits on what they're showing/doing and only one of them is getting anywhere remotely close to masturbating on camera with the others displaying varying degrees of nudity (and in three of those cases, blurring/blocking/Photoshopping nipples and vulva out of pictures and videos for different reasons).
Yep, if it's in any way ambiguous, it's always a scam.
Learned that the hard way. Now I ask if its not explicitly clear, and if they don't explain what it actually is I just call them on their bullshit and move on.
You know you can get your money back if they use deceptive language right? It's against terms of service for the site. I've done it 3 times. Customer service will usually argue a little but as long as you use there own ToS, and it's obviously deceptive language it works
Worst case, you can request your credit card company to perform a chargeback. It'll stick it to Onlyfans for their enablement of their creators' worst tendencies.
Nobody does. Unless you want to hide your coochie. Which is what they want.
I think I said this earlier in the thread or in at least one or two other discussion threads, but the point still stands: Onlyfans/Fansly/Patreon/wherever sex work is permitted are the only places where revealing a body part that all women have - a breast, a nipple, a vagina, a clitoris, an ass, an asshole, you name it - is a big deal and the "creators" can milk the debut of one of these body parts as a major gala event that deserves major attention and in a lot of cases, some serious coin if this body part reveal is either a PPV or a "pay to unlock" scenario.
I don't think it's an impossibility that Lauren will show us her pussy with her legs uncrossed, but that's the name of the game when someone's in sex work and trying to ensure she doesn't give it all away so her simp followers get bored too easily with her. If she's never going to do porn, she has to spread out the reveals in such a way that she either gets her bag or doesn't see her revenue drop off too quickly.
Last edited:
