Simp Chat Joey Fisher

[Kincaid85]

Joey needs her own discussion thread, no? =)

But also, Ami the only one who thinks Joey needs to come back to MCG? Besides the fact that her boobs have seem to grow lately, she just gets better and better with age. I don't know what were reasons to quit MCG, but she seems to still be interested in modelling (and the OF sets definitely still have the glamour model vibes).
IMO, she's wasted on OF. And even if she goes back to MCG, she can still maintain her OF, regardless. It just feels like she still have a few more good years left in her.

What's your take?
BTW, does she ever gave a reason as to why she quit?

 

[Nih!]

Did she ever do fully nude? as in, not covered with her hand or whatever.

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

No, as far as I recall. Even when she got completely naked, she always covered her pussy with her hand. Didn't really mind, though, as there were always some good views of her lovely arse, as well.

 

[bilda]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

There are a couple of pics where you can see a little bit of her pussy. You can find them in the September 14, 2022 posts of her content thread. I don't know if there are more, though.

Joey has a great body, but frankly I think her OF content may be the worst among British glamour models. I haven't subscribed to her, but from what I see on her content thread, she charges as much as $25 for a PPV which consists of a handful of topless pics.

For comparison, $25 is twice what Sammy Braddy charges for a full striptease video where she talks to the camera and sometimes does roleplays. For the $12.99 subscription price, you get thousands of topless pics on her feed. Even Lucy Vixen has more topless pics on her "nothingbutcurves" OF feed, and that's for $9.99 at full price.
I'm not saying Sammy and Lucy's OF don't have problems of their own, but imo you get much more value for your money.

 

[Jeff Coogan]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Joey deffo charges too much and its especially annoying when you buy some ppv and the most revealing you get is a handbra,

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

There're many other models who charge less than Joey and give much more content, for sure. Although, IMO- nothing will be better than a set of 80-90+ professional pics and vidz.
Joey's OF content is frustrating. It's weird she went from going (not completely) nude, to just implied and hadnbras.

Now that the Lads-mags is doing a comeback (in the form of the upcoming new Ladsmag, "Stacked Magazine"), it'll be a good way for Joey to make a comeback. They already have a roster of stunners, Joey would fit right in.

 

[Jeff Coogan]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

She's basically posting Instagram content 4-5 days a week for $15 a month.

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Indeed. Seen her latest updates on her main thread- she is trying to imitate the MCG style of shoots, that's obvious. So why not do it with them (or another site) professionally?

 

[FictitiousSmurf]

What I wouldn't give to see her go down the same path as Sophie Reade.

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Yeah. I am not sure why but a lot of these Busty British Glamour Models like Joey Fisher that were in Zoo and Nuts Magazine always covered their pussy and I always thought it was weird American Glamour Models that done Playboy were willing to show more. There were some exceptions, of course but a lot of them only showed their boobs and butts.

 

[Nih!]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Sophie Reade just went straight in the deep end (or is that the Dredd end) God bless her!
She was doing lots of hand bras/ covering/ etc like Joey Fisher, but then she went all in. The Big Brother money must have dried up, but she seems to be enjoying it.

Georgie Darby does May Contain Girl like Fisher, and she started out Page3/zoo/nuts etc. But she does her own solo explicit stuff. It depends on the girl.
I can't remember, does zoo and nuts do the bottom half? Anyways, I think some of these glamour models make a pact with themselves that if they just show their boobs it's glamour modeling and they cover below because that would be veering towards porn.

Also, these magazines are not considered porn so it could be something to do with genitalia on show. If the model is shaven and she has a pronounced labia, it's easier to get her to hide it than to do a bad airbrushed edit. Then again Jordan Carver and Denise Milani made their careers and plenty of money by showing bugger all.

 

[Kincaid85]

It's mostly a cultural thing, and also because there's a distinct line between glamour/topless modeling and porn that they never crossed (IMHO, not a bad thing at all. Porn is porn and GM is GM). The reason why most of them won't show their nether regions is because of that (even those who do show their nether region, like Poppy Hughes or Beth Morgan, never show them explicitly).

As for Sophie Reade (which, I'll admit, I've never liked one bit)- it's laughable to even consider her a glamour model. She didn't start there (unlike others like Lucy Pinder, Holly Peers, Melissa Debling, Jodie Gasson, to name a few), her "popularity" was because she was a BB participant. She just did it all for money and attention. Back then, ladmags were popular, so she did that. She even had her own website, but she didn't stick to it at all (also, sets and vidz were really shite). Now, OF models and porn is popular, so she's doing that now (and she's not very good at it at all, and no matter how huge her ego is, she will never come close to be like Jenna Jameson. Ever.).
To each their own, but to me, she's was never a real glamour model. Just another attention whore, who is all fake.

 

[Jeff Coogan]

Latest ppv is $28.99 for 5 pictures, fair enough they're implied nude but there's not a pair of tits in the world I'd pay $6 a picture for.

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Agreed. No pair of tits, no matter how amazing, are worth 30$ for just 5 (!!!!!) pics.

 

[Integral21]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Especially when there's already 1,000 pics of them out there for free.

She needs to up her game.

 

[beber]

It's most likely just a hunch,but I think she switched over to doing Onlyfans exclusively to have more control over her content,and she could be in a phase where she's near "retirement" in a sense where she decides how much and how often she does semi nude stuff ? Who knows,I still noticed that Gavin Glave does shoots for her OF content,but his stuff will never beat MCG's photosets/videos in my honest opinion. OF wise I definitely miss her self shot videos of try on hauls from 2-3 years ago.

 

[Jeff Coogan]

Just seems like a terrible business model where the monthly sub is $15 and to get the content you actually want you are going to need to pay an additional $20 (at least) every week, twice that if there is a video as well.

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Maybe so, but in the process she deteriorated into Insta-like content. She barely (if at all) show her boobs.
I'm wondering why not quit altogether? It's weird, seeing as models are usually upping their game, not going backwards (in Joey's case, going from implied nude to semi-nude (if at all).

On a side note-

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

That's the problem with OF (and the like)- they charge you crazy amounts (base sub + ppv and other content behind paywalls), while the content itself usually lacks quality (and quantity). How is this better than the days you paid a sub for a site (and sometimes, like Socialglamour, it gave you access to an entire network) and got better quality/quantity content?

 

[bilda]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

The sad truth is, plenty of OF models don't care whether their subscribers are getting good value for their money. If they're still getting paid for worse content than what they used to do, they have no interest in upping their game.

 

[Jeff Coogan]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Lucy Vixen just put up her sub to $25 which is fucking ridiculous as there is no content really, you just get bombarded with ppv messages. She does have a lot of cheaper ppv stuff but that $25 gets you nothing really.

 

[Kincaid85]

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

I wonder if it has anything to do with a post she made on IG about two months ago (now I see she deleted it), where she was supposed to be on a reality tv show. Guess that didn't work out. Is she really that stressed for cash?
Also, weirdly enough, she doesn't promote her OF as much on her socials.