True but she didn't for the longest time and still holds out with boobs and face. Like Amouranth does but it's still in the most unsatisfying way possible and I imagine CK will do it in a similar way.
There's also the fact that even though I think it helps her greatly and she's more attractive with the work she's had done (curiously), Amouranth's tits are fake and Christina's are natural. This does make the appeal of seeing Christina's bare tits a little higher than that of Amouranth's.
Bro, i Just looked up Amouranth and i dont get it! To me she's just a generic thot with too much makeup and fake tits, what am i missing here? Why the comparison to Khalil? Are they friends or sometin? To me these two bitches belong in totally different ethot categories. Don't get me wrong im an omnivore when it comes to these bitches & i'll watch anything for free but that Amouranth girl is jush meh!
Surprised you've not heard of Amouranth since she's ubiquitous with Twitch culture and is the top-earner on Onlyfans (or was when last I checked).
you're spot on that OF is becoming very mainstream and normalized, although a bit sad that someone can make more income from squating on a cake in a wet bra than being, ya know, a teacher or EMT... but I digress...
I've mentioned in a separate discussion thread that I'm curious to see how the probable recession that'll hit in four or so months will impact Onlyfans creators' bottom lines. The disposable income of horny and probably lonely men craving attention is not going to be what it is if they don't have that coin funneling in or they have to tighten their belt loops a bit - and that's not even acknowledging the inflation shit we're dealing with everywhere.
The take we're not going to see on CNN
I'm always up for debating the subject "why do hot women like (insert OF creator/model here - Christina Khalil in this case) only show so much or only go so far?" And we've covered it to death in this thread and other relevant creators' discussion threads. Since these horny/lonely men have free will to spend their money as they please, we can't trust the masses/majority to withhold their money to persuade a creator to take things further for the right price. Therefore, we can leverage an economic event to persuade a nudity-skittish creator to get their kit off perhaps.
I think them not going fully naked is what keeps the money rolling in. It’s like once they go fully naked & making amateur porn the itch for the guys paying has been itched so they don’t feel the desire to keep paying. Also, once they go naked that then sets the standard at which they have to regularly deliver. The tease keeps these dudes hooked
Correct and I've suggested the same thing as have others. Even still, you can go nude in phases and once the bits are revealed over time, you can probably keep a lot of your viewers as long as you're doing something interesting or keep your content fresh. Or make it a one-and-done or once-in-a-while thing like Natalie Roush does. She's gone topless and has shown 95% of her body and appears to be doing fine with her OF sub count/income.
Someone in a different forum said she did a lot of the same shit as usual - a lot of butt plug footage, some vibrator/wand stuff, less shower time. I'd wait for the livestream to make an appearance to get the official scoop or if someone else was watching, they can comment more accurately on what she did.
no squating on fruit cake ? seems apropos for the season... or maybe the fruit cake was the butt plug ?
According to the source, no fruitcake action. Supposedly her longest livestream ever but featuring content we've grown accustomed to already.no squating on fruit cake ? seems apropos for the season... or maybe the fruit cake was the butt plug ?
Wha ? Umm...I truly hope you weren't sincerely replying to my intently facetious...er, never mind, keep up the good work !
Honestly, I sensed 50% humor (facetiousness) and 50% genuine interest, the latter being why I responded honestly. At best, those who wanted to know for sure are at least having that question answered.Wha ? Umm...I truly hope you weren't sincerely replying to my intently facetious...er, never mind, keep up the good work !
Sounds like they did in the different forum, just a matter of time and patience.