Simp Chat Dessyyc - Dessy - oxdessyxo
- Thread starter nashvilleOffice
- Start date
Did this gal just break it off with that little man child? She seems to be kicking it up a notch
Idk I feel like they live together. That being said, I think she finally realized that she could make a fuck ton of money and spend way less time being the one responding. She's gotta be raking it in now
They live together and just got a dog. Doubt they've broken up or anything. That dude is fucking weird though.
I think she's gonna have a problem that she already built up such a quality following, but it became blatantly obvious she handed off her OF to an agency/somebody else to respond. She's gonna have to keep prices high in order to keep making the money she wants to make IMO
Yeah, she's been running her OF for years with most of her content being under $40. Then suddenly you gotta pay $25 a month to have access to +$100 content?
I let my sub expire at the end of Jan and I haven't got a single message (free or premium) since so seems her agency may also completely ignore people not on her premium.
She could have been doing the spicier content for a lot of $$ while maintaining the normal content but I guess I think too highly of OF models sometimes.
I let my sub expire at the end of Jan and I haven't got a single message (free or premium) since so seems her agency may also completely ignore people not on her premium.
She could have been doing the spicier content for a lot of $$ while maintaining the normal content but I guess I think too highly of OF models sometimes.
I've noticed she is now deleting everything you haven't bought in her messages. She'll send something, then the next day it's cleared from the history and you can't buy it. Pretty scummy imo
Genuinely feels like she's doing everything she can to fail lol none of her choices in the last month have made sense.
On another note, for big spenders... are her prices still ridiculously high? Because when I asked her about them I got this,
Last edited:
If she ever decides to go more sexier with orgasms and full on nude spreads, she'll cash in big time for sure.
A few days ago she/her agency did a ridiculously high cost, low effort couple of pictures that I was suckered in to. You'll see another person posting what I mean in the content thread. It was like $300 for a shitty video and some old pictures, no nudity. There's no way in hell she's worth what she (or the agency, most likely) is wanting for the pics. I know recently she sent a message that was like $6 to view some text. Lol.
Pretty unfortunate, I agree that's she's trying to speed run failing.
Definitely appreciate what has been posted, but I'm not supporting her anymore
I was the dumbass who paid 6 dollars before realizing it was text.
"shud i send it to you HAHHA 🤭"
It's kinda crazy that she put her premium half price. That means the people who think full price is too much will hopefully sub, right? Because then she just instantly chases off those people with her pricing lol. I don't get it
6$? I got one for almost $100 and I was suckered in to getting it... Didn't realize it was just a text before I opened it
Yeah the $100 one was first, I got suckered as well. Then she did it again at $6
I think the thing that hurts me the most is that she still is delusional enough to not admit that she switched. I was subbed for 3+ years and made great impressions and she remembered a lot about me. And right when the switch happened it was like talking to someone for the very first time. Anything I asked “her” I would be left on read and then responded to a few hours later presumably the chat manager had to ask her for the answer, not to mention the broken English and rudeness of whoever is running the chat now. I called her out in other DMs to which she cried about her new dog being the reason why she forgot all about me in which like, doesn’t make any sense from any way you look at it and I’m sure she knows it. It’s obvious she went agency but she can at least attempt to come up with a better excuse to the people who got her to this point, no?