MEMORIAL DAY - JOIN BRAZZERS FOR FREE - CLICK HERE!
Simp Chat - Meg Turney - The Quest for Content: The Search for Butthole | Page 257 | SimpCity Forums

Simp Chat Meg Turney - The Quest for Content: The Search for Butthole

Orange8920

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 11, 2022
871
8,298
1,214
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
She crossed that threshold into sex work in early 2021 when she first started posting videos topless and upping everything else up after. She's a softcore porn model at this point who's work I'd consider digital sex work. I think there's even a tweet from a year or two ago where she puts herself in with that group.
 

Tootoo909

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 13, 2022
94
1,322
1,242
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
LOL @ Meg's "I want this to be a fun sexy place" line.

Nothing says fun like gouging your customers for a set where you don't deliver, and nothing says sexy like being an e-skank who can't say the word pussy.

I wish I understood the business side of it on her end. If she doesn't need the money, and if she doesn't enjoy doing this, which I think is pretty clear at this point, then why do it? If she does need the money, why doesn't she ever make improvements to the product? She could have actually ramped up to something great for this weird, gay Megmas thing, but she just boofed it.

If I won the lottery, I'd leave my job so quickly, the fucking espostos roof would catch fire. Meg seems like she won the lottery, but is going to all the other cubicles/offices to chat with people and talk about her next steps and shit...just fucking leave or do you job. god.

Maybe....MAYBE...she thinks she is still in a stage where she can do the slow tease to butthole....but like...Meg issssss kind of starting to....a little bit...maybe...not look super young anymore?? Her tits used to be big but firm, now they're kind of a little droopy. He ass used to be big, but it was perky, now its just big. Her face...yeah. Idk. I think the idea of her running a year long tease mission for butthole, after a year of just not doing much of anything, seems a little wild, especially as her other assets start to lose their novelty/appeal.
 

uniqueerrormessage

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 11, 2022
47
2,316
1,242
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
I think she does enjoy it, just doesn't enjoy *all* of it.
She certainly likes the attention, and likes to be able to do creative stuff and travel, and then get paid for it on top. I think it's just that she doesn't like feeling obligated to constantly put out new content and really doesn't like negative attention from being called out on being inactive or sets that flop.
Unfortunately you can only get away with taking time off when you're doing a strictly free-to-follow page. Monthly subscription fees for pages that don't update make unhappy subscribers. Same with overpricing/overhyping PPV sets. I'm not gonna rant and rave about it like some posts I've seen here and there, because it seems to be coming from a place of insecurity or ignorance instead of intentional scamming or greed. That said, you're still going to have people that feel ripped off or disrespected and it takes thick skin to just accept that and work with it, which she doesn't usually have.
 

Tootoo909

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 13, 2022
94
1,322
1,242
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Respectfully, I disagree.

All of the attention she gets through OF ranges from people who think she's physically attractive and cool to people who would probably want to do some pretty unspeakable things to/with her. Meg is in a long-term commited relationship. If (and it's a big if) she isn't getting enough sex-related attention from Gavin, why would she not give people what they want aka if she showed her arsehole/made a JOI she'd get more attention than she would know what to do with. She doesn't like attention, it's a consequence of her job, and she plays it up from time to time, to make it seems like she's engaged with her audience.

Meg is scatterbrained, maybe evena little naive, but she didn't write that $75 description without realizing she was towing the line between reality and bullshit. She knew, she calculated, she figured it was worth it...and it probably was.

Maybe she's just completed capitalism and is now doing the side quests?? Who knows.
 

udyrvarus

Superfan
Mar 11, 2022
84
519
639
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
ok, so we're talking she is going full amouranth scam? that's what it seems some people in here think, i could be wrong, but i dont think so, at this point im not even sure if you can call what amouranth does "scamming", it was at some point, but anyone should know what to expect from an amouranth video by now.
 

Orange8920

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 11, 2022
871
8,298
1,214
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
There's people that either joke or are actually serious about fully explicit stuff but I've never had that expectation. I just want her to think about the style and presentation of her content and maybe change or adjust some things.

She has a thicc body but the state of her content means its either shown in 10-20 pics or in 2-3 second poses. There's never a sustained look at it outside of try-ons and even those aren't what they used to be because she changed the style up a bit. I'd be fine with just seeing her body for longer durations than anything involving masturbation or something.
 

cuppy

Bathwater Drinker
Oct 22, 2021
71
3,873
1,242
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
I just want to see her throw that ass like she did in the nun vid.

 

Tootoo909

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 13, 2022
94
1,322
1,242
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Would you not argue that her literally doubling/tripling the price of a set with weeks of build up to it was not her suggesting that the "stakes" had been raised?

You are correct. Most people here realize that Meg is a timid pin-up model type OF creator. Though some are delusional and some shit talk because they have no lives (I'm the latter). But there's also been a range to her pricing, typically between 10 - 40 dollars for a set.

She totally preyed upon the implicit idea that higher cost = more nudity/better posing/etc. and underdelivered with a misleading summary.

If I ordered a 28 dollar pizza every week and then one week they said it was 75 dollars, I wouldn't think "Oh, I know this pizza place though, this will just be 99% the same thing I always order." I would think "Jesus Christ this pizza is going to bust a flavour nut in my mouth and do my taxes for me."

If the set was 40 bucks, I'd agree with you. People would be wrong for assuming it would be more than it was. But Meg broke the soft contract of "costs to expectations" this time, not us.
 

lordbipbop

Bathwater Drinker
May 1, 2022
195
3,542
1,252
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
What she did with the 75 dollar set was all planned and cynical as hell.

Her first set of the month was the photo asshole reveal. Then she waited for the last set to do a video 'asshole' reveal. She planned to basically blue ball all the ass lovers for the whole month. Give them a real tease first set of the month, keep them hooked and desperate all month long, then hike the price up massively and still not reveal anything...she knew full well the poor subs would buy it. Especially if she lied and overplayed the description.

I mean she said 'spreading her cheeks'. It's a blatant lie. She knew it when she wrote it and she knew it when she charged 75.

She's done her rep no good at all with a lot of her subs. I mean right now, why the fuck would anyone pay for any more of her sets? They reveal nothing, the poses have been getting steadily worse the whole year. And now we all know she lies.

Good luck getting any poor fucker to pay for an expensive set again Meg.
 

Orange8920

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 11, 2022
871
8,298
1,214
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Compare this to that fishnet video from roughly 2 years ago that was a pussy reveal. It was covered a bit in fishnets but you saw it, and it was there and I don't remember it being priced that high.

She heavily implied, not us, her, that there'd be more of a view that would show some hole that wasn't there. She could have strictly sold this as "look at this POV that looks like me getting fucked" without suggestion of anything else and it'd be fine. Expensive and still kind of disappointing but fine.

Without some sort of feedback I wouldn't be surprised if she just continually released expensive 2 minute videos for breadcrumbs of a reveal because that's how the wider world of OF women who are strictly in it to maximize their money work. I'm sure that very little bit of camera bouncing back and forth was revealing to her but it came off as a cash grab.
 

Orange8920

Bathwater Drinker
Mar 11, 2022
871
8,298
1,214
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
With all due respect I feel like you're almost always pointing the finger at anyone critical of her content and never at her. It's okay to be critical and question things and discuss when things hit and when they bomb.

The people who do so want things to either change a bit or get better so we're not looking at the same exact content in 2024 that we got in 2022. Most of the people replying are doing so in good faith because they care.

This set was enough of a misfire where she took it down after a week. She either acts hurt and withdrawn over it or learns from it and course corrects. That could be either trying to meet what's advertised or only advertising things she's ready to deliver on.