Unless definitive proof comes out mods won't risk it, even then if it's revenge porn it won't be allowed. End of the day however, no one here is mass reporting posts, it's just the mods doing their job.
Speaking of that, what are the proofs that the girl in the baka yaro is Keeki? I've seen the pics over and over in compillations and are the most lewd and impersonal pics you can find of... her?
Like, how do you recognize her?
You perfectly could make the same case against this pics that against the nude ones. The only saving grace of this pics is that they have the baka yaro logo which invalidates them as revenge porn/illegal.
If you check his patreon (baka yaro/ kuma kreation), where I got all of them, he credits some of the models. Although I will admit I just posted the sets from those archive.org screencaps that claim they were her as the model since he reuses costumes like this uniform and even a similar strawberry bikini
Believe me, I'd love to see nudes of her, too, but these are fake.
There's nothing that would imply that Keeki herself made these photos for public consumption. There are the moles, but you can easily see that the skin tone around them differs from the rest of the image, which suggests a doctored image. There's also the fact that the images have a ton of beautifying effects on them which would erase said moles, too, yet they are still there. On the other hand, a rather well known birthmark on her right breast is missing from both pictures.
You know it's fake when even the smaller chans don't recognize them as even plausible ones and Keeki has amassed a lot of haters during her activities, this would be the ripe time to exact some revenge on her by besullying her image, photos fake or not. Yet that doesn't happen, which only suggest that these photos are so fake that not even her detractors would risk getting laughed at for trying to pull it out. Said haters have also never found any link to websites that would suggest that Keeki once had a subscription-based private mailing service.
If it were revenge porn, it wouldn't be censored, or dripped out on the internet one by one. We'd also have further proof that someone received these images with additional texts and the like. It also wouldn't look like something from an OnlyFans/Fansly photoset, taking quick pictures of herself and uploading them in an album, something that's very common in the scene. Just take a look at the thousands of other leaks on this website.
Speaking of, I actually tried to look into the origins of the photos and while I didn't find them yet, I've found at least 3 or 4 candidates that could have been used for faking purposes easily. They didn't have to be these exact photos, a bit of Photoshop could have achieved the same results on other images as well, which just futher confirms that all of this is the work of a single person who found a set of nudes from a similar looking girl and is trying to mess with the internet whenever he's bored.
There's nothing that would imply that Keeki herself made these photos for public consumption. There are the moles, but you can easily see that the skin tone around them differs from the rest of the image, which suggests a doctored image. There's also the fact that the images have a ton of beautifying effects on them which would erase said moles, too, yet they are still there. On the other hand, a rather well known birthmark on her right breast is missing from both pictures.
You know it's fake when even the smaller chans don't recognize them as even plausible ones and Keeki has amassed a lot of haters during her activities, this would be the ripe time to exact some revenge on her by besullying her image, photos fake or not. Yet that doesn't happen, which only suggest that these photos are so fake that not even her detractors would risk getting laughed at for trying to pull it out. Said haters have also never found any link to websites that would suggest that Keeki once had a subscription-based private mailing service.
If it were revenge porn, it wouldn't be censored, or dripped out on the internet one by one. We'd also have further proof that someone received these images with additional texts and the like. It also wouldn't look like something from an OnlyFans/Fansly photoset, taking quick pictures of herself and uploading them in an album, something that's very common in the scene. Just take a look at the thousands of other leaks on this website.
Speaking of, I actually tried to look into the origins of the photos and while I didn't find them yet, I've found at least 3 or 4 candidates that could have been used for faking purposes easily. They didn't have to be these exact photos, a bit of Photoshop could have achieved the same results on other images as well, which just futher confirms that all of this is the work of a single person who found a set of nudes from a similar looking girl and is trying to mess with the internet whenever he's bored.
A post she made in her now locked account, using the same socks and in the sofa that appears in many of that guy's sets, you can find similar things from other of the sets like posts of lingerie and that, there is also some things that didn't get archive but were proof , I have seen ones, but that's just "trust me bro".
Anyways, I don't think we should post without being able to back up with proof if asked.
To be honest as much as i like do argue with people its not really worth it with people like you who take everything for full just because some random dude says it on the internet. I know plenty of more stuff about Keeki and i know several people who were into these vtuber information thing like finding out their real faces and shit. And shit like that came up every so often and in the end none of it was real. And just assuming that it is real based on some moles which can be added like nothing is just embarrassing to you and everyone else.
But if you really want to believe it that the nudes are her go ahead. Make a fool out of yourself i won't stop you anymore.
'From all the evidence' and 'without any proof' could also be used as arguments why it shouldn't be posted here. eg. fakes, questionable age or revenge porn.
On the one hand I think it'd be interesting if they were real, why they exist and if there's more. And I don't think it would affect her much, if at all. I also couldn't find the rumored v1 of the first image in any archives.
On the other hand, the whole thing is just sus. the edited part in the corner to censor what was most likely some kind of watermark.
Then the second pic which was posted as proof for the first one to be real is really badly photoshopped, especially tummy and crotch. Doesn't really help the case (and wasn't used as proof on the chans after that one time).
When asked for proof, the answer is always 'trust me bro'. Unlike with pomu, where a lot of supposed evidence was provided with the pictures. could still be fake but at least they tried.
The only thing keeki's antis have proven time after time is that they failed at every step to actually find something against her that sticks since most of the narratives they try to push are easily identified as fake or overly exaggerated, out of context stuff. So I tend to be very skeptical of anything that comes out of that corner.
And if they are indeed real, I agree with zekezekezeke and strongly doubt those images were taken to be distributed online and fall into the category revenge porn, which is against site rules. There are other sites without this rule, so share there if you absolutely have to I guess.
Last edited:
I can't imagine jerking off to something that is most likely shared unconsensually. Some of the guys in this thread are so weird. "Hnnnnng i wish it was revenge porn of her so I could crank my hog until my urethra prolapses UOOOOOOOOOOGH"
Mate, literally everything uploaded here is "unconsensually". Why would she want to give out her gravure for free? That's expensive Etsy and patreon content. Not only that, she deleted it because she doesn't want it to spread around (for now). I truly wonder why people come here to a place like this and trying to moral shame lol.
Well maybe he meant that one (fake) nude picture. if it were real it was most likely sent to 1 person possibly (ex. boyfriend) which is indeed revenge porn.
The other stuff posted here is in fact illegal too but there is a difference between these 2 things. all of the woman on here posting their nudes willingly on paysites like onlyfans.
There's a big legal difference between public and private.
Re-distributing something that was willingly published online, like gravure sets which anyone could buy, is legally just piracy. It's only a copyright issue. Worst case scenario, the website gets a DMCA takedown request.
Re-distributing nude images that were only ever sent to one private individual (or a small number of private individuals) with the expectation or privacy, is legally considered non-consensual nudity, or revenge porn. Not only is it against the terms of service of this site, it's a criminal offence nowadays.
Actually, the only reason you can't buy the gravure sets any more is that some spammer bought a ton of copies of one set using hacked Etsy account (probably to test stolen credit cards) and she shut down the account to avoid getting hit with chargebacks. You would still be able to buy if not for that.
you do realize revenge porn and pirating gravure are different, right?
why no one pays attention to the shape of the lips, the shape of the lips is quite a unique thing, so in these photos the shape of the lips is perfect for any of her photos. I don’t argue that anything can be faked, but there’s quite a lot of things that converge here: the shape of the navel, most of the moles (some could disappear due to filters and processing of the original photos), the shape of the lips and the overall physique
Why everyone thought of these photos as revenge porn from her ex-bf?
Did you guys remember that she had a phone got stolen in Germany?
Maybe that's why these selfies were leaked.
oh shit that's actually a very good point. She has also been "hacked" several times. and by hacked I mean someone found out her old password and it's possible it was the same password on other websites. Those nudes could have been years old Ko-Fi DMs for example.
in this case, there would obviously be more than 2 photos and one more thing in these photos, the lower left part is covered up, why do this in a photo for personal use? There is also no need to do this in a photo to send a conditional BF.
The Bakayaro shots are definitely her. I was once a Patreon subscriber of hers for some short time. Although I cannot provide any hard evidence on this, I recall, that she posted she had done several anonymous photo shoots with him and posted some examples of these sets. She further wished, that her Patreon followers do not disclose that it was her.
(And sorry to disappoint you, I was never in possession of the still missing gravure sets. I am waiting for them myself.)
No she didn't. What I was refering to were photos from the released set as seen in the other thread. It was, not in this words (it's some years ago after all), more like: "look at these photos from Bakayaro of which are more on his website. It's me. Please don't tell anyone."