- Thread starter Deeks
- Start date
- Reply 598
Damn, I was looking for her recent Valentine's video to relax and get a hard on, but here is youtube being youtube.
Ah found it, it survived, apparently she just took it off her video lists
Ah found it, it survived, apparently she just took it off her video lists
I'm in the process of download all the videos that she put on the blacklisted site... they rate limit heavy. No point in doing a batch download when you can only download 1 at a time -.-
Will mirror those once I have them all downloaded. Currently at 23/89 downloaded
Will mirror those once I have them all downloaded. Currently at 23/89 downloaded
In her last video she commented that since everything with YT is going awful, she gave up in one way, so she will move n upload those and new ear eating videos "to another platform". I wonder what platform will be. She sould say "Patreon" easily, but. Let me dream with just the start of something good.
She was never blunt giving her opinion about making sensual or implicitly suggestive content. This is because she has told several times that during her life she has gone through sexual identity crises and even thought she was asexual. All because she comes from a family that was religious and old-fashioned regarding sexuality. But it is also true that she has said that she respects girls who do NSFW but that she is not interested in doing it at all...for the moment. "I'm still discovering myself" said in one of her lives (Girls already on her 30's xd). May god distribute luck for us all.
She was never blunt giving her opinion about making sensual or implicitly suggestive content. This is because she has told several times that during her life she has gone through sexual identity crises and even thought she was asexual. All because she comes from a family that was religious and old-fashioned regarding sexuality. But it is also true that she has said that she respects girls who do NSFW but that she is not interested in doing it at all...for the moment. "I'm still discovering myself" said in one of her lives (Girls already on her 30's xd). May god distribute luck for us all.
I'm pretty sure she already floated Vimeo as the probable platform. Sorry to crush your dreams, homie.
Let me dream my friend, I will be satisfied and more than happy if she gets to do only sensual content. After having seen several ethots that started doing sfw and ended up showing everything for money u realize that quality suggestive content >> explicit. And Frivi is very good making her stuff.
I have no control over what you or anyone else thinks/believes/dreams.
I simply offered my opinion on the likelihood of your scenario in the real world. It’s all speculative, anyway, everyone has their own anecdotal examples they assume project more broadly.
I've just ended my dream rn reading the post on her community where she says that all deleted videos will be on 0dysee web and new ear eating videos will be uploaded to Patreon once a month.
It's going to be a problem while Youtube has so much dominance. Elon's been talking a big game about encouraging more creators to upload on twitter but I've seen nothing of that, along with the rumours of him pushing the video side of the platform to compete with google. I'd suggest she look at LTT's floatplane, but he largely only votes tech community stuff.
The simple truth is that we've collectively built the monster that is youtube, and we need something somewhere that espouses freedom of speech and expression but comes up with safeguards that keeps a modicum of respect for advertiser sensibilties on unmarked content. I don't know what the options are - in truth neither twitch/amazon or microsoft appear to be willing to put up the money to create the kind of competitor that I'm talking about.
The simple truth is that we've collectively built the monster that is youtube, and we need something somewhere that espouses freedom of speech and expression but comes up with safeguards that keeps a modicum of respect for advertiser sensibilties on unmarked content. I don't know what the options are - in truth neither twitch/amazon or microsoft appear to be willing to put up the money to create the kind of competitor that I'm talking about.
ITT people are realizing that big tech has been monopolized by a few corporations.
There can't be a real competitor to youtube. They are too large. It is literally impossible. That's like trying to compete with Amazon starting out of your garage, or to start your own McDonalds copy with the goal of beating McDs.
Not unless the government breaks apart Alphabet, Microsoft, and a few others. But they won't, because they are profitable, and profits write the laws
It's more that YouTube makes staggeringly little revenue and requires a huge infra investment. It's not impossible to compete, but it is a natural monopoly.
I was way ahead of the curve, I've been saying for years that maybe, just maybe we should have been keeping an eye on the exert of control that companies have over our media, our expression and our speech - but lord no, way back in 2001 when I called a lot of this, I got told to sit quietly in my IRC server and keep my tinfoil hat theories to myself.
I absolutely agree that there needs to be a break up (amongst other things) - but that's never going to happen, which is why I suggested the two other companies and one person in the world with the will and the capital to take on alphabet at this stage. it won't happen, but I offer my insight.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to my IRC server.
Yep. Very few people saw what the world would be turning in to post 2001. No single layman could had predict that we would be going so far down a privacy nightmare. At the time, that sounded like a good plan... 10 years later when everyone has a camera, microphone and GPS tracker in their pocket 24/7... yeah...
The privacy nightmare is intentional. Google and companies off of its ilk has a business model entirely predicated on knowing as much about you as possible (which is why nothing I've given them in the form of ID is genuine) - but a lot of people were warning about this slope. In 2001 the US and UK were talking up a paperless office with digital ID. Hell. I was worrying people about the "harmless possibilities" of contextual advertising that would come out of phorm.
Don't get me wrong, coming off of the tragedy that was 9-11, all these anti privacy, draconian policies that the US was pushing seemed like a good idea. When there is a very real threat of mass death, people willingly hand in some of their freedoms. At the time, that was a great idea, and I was totally in favor of the patriot act at the time.
But I was quite a bit younger and ignorant back then, too. Hindsight is 20/20. If we knew that the 9-11 attacks were one off and there was not an immediate risk of another attack, ever, my opinion would had been different, but you just can't know those kinds of things.
Think my eyes opened up right around the time the WMDs in Iraq were found to be fake, and google started to drop their 'don't be evil' slogan.
But I was quite a bit younger and ignorant back then, too. Hindsight is 20/20. If we knew that the 9-11 attacks were one off and there was not an immediate risk of another attack, ever, my opinion would had been different, but you just can't know those kinds of things.
Think my eyes opened up right around the time the WMDs in Iraq were found to be fake, and google started to drop their 'don't be evil' slogan.