EXCLUSIVE OFFER - WATCH CAMSODA GIRLS LIVE FOR FREE!!! - CLICK HERE
  • We have blocked access to our website from TOR nodes and a datacenter in France (some VPN connections to the country might be faulty) due to abusive behaviour. If things quiet down - they'll be enabled again in a few days/weeks.

Simp Chat Christina Khalil Discussion Thread

At what point does she say screw it and start going topless? She's at Amouranth levels of modesty where she'll lightly play with BBCs but showing her nipples is somehow crossing the line.
 
At what point does she say screw it and start going topless? She's at Amouranth levels of modesty where she'll lightly play with BBCs but showing her nipples is somehow crossing the line.
It's a slow walk. As others have noted in other discussion threads, there's a gradual process to showing off parts of a woman's body if she's an e-thot - the last part usually involves unobstructed views of the pussy, hopefully inclusive of clitoris. She's trying to make sure she doesn't give everyone what they want too quickly as that means everyone saw, they came and left (if you know what I mean) and don't plan on returning (lost subs). The more popular they are, the easier it is for them to slow walk these reveals and the more we bitch about their reluctance to show off the best parts. They probably have management companies or friends in the industry giving them advice as to what to show when, meaning they'll do it when they're ready and feeling like they're about to peak instead of providing it to a bunch of longtime, loyal fans that have probably earned it.
 
After that buttplug video, I think the countdown to full boobs/pussy can begin. Her pussy lips are a bit meaty so if she is insecure about them, she might never really show them fully.
 
At what point does she say screw it and start going topless? She's at Amouranth levels of modesty where she'll lightly play with BBCs but showing her nipples is somehow crossing the line.
Amouranth shows her tits so your comparison makes no sense
 
Amouranth shows her tits so your comparison makes no sense
It's been over a year and Amouranth shows tits but never with her face in the frame or only with see-thru bras. The Amouranth comparison is because they're both playing with sex toys at this point but showing unambiguous nudity is too far for some reason.

Christina Khalil grinding on BBC dildos and having buttplugs peek out her ass feels like the point where going topless shouldn't be forbidden. In the end I know its a money thing but its still odd.
 
It's been over a year and Amouranth shows tits but never with her face in the frame or only with see-thru bras. The Amouranth comparison is because they're both playing with sex toys at this point but showing unambiguous nudity is too far for some reason.

Christina Khalil grinding on BBC dildos and having buttplugs peek out her ass feels like the point where going topless shouldn't be forbidden. In the end I know its a money thing but its still odd.
Not only is it a slow walk (as I said a few posts above), it's a hustle. You don't want to play the nudity card too quickly or you'll allow thousands of simps to shoot their loads and cross another one off of their nudity wishlists without coming back for more (and fewer $$$ from simps as a result). Others have said much of the same before in other discussion threads, so I'm not stating an original thought - though I believe it holds up here.

I wish there was a reasonable way to get across to these content creators that people will give them a lot of money to actually deliver on the goods and it's because these people legitimately like them shy of simping for them - and that they shouldn't alienate their faithful subs by only delivering halfway for years on end.
 
Not only is it a slow walk (as I said a few posts above), it's a hustle. You don't want to play the nudity card too quickly or you'll allow thousands of simps to shoot their loads and cross another one off of their nudity wishlists without coming back for more (and fewer $$$ from simps as a result). Others have said much of the same before in other discussion threads, so I'm not stating an original thought - though I believe it holds up here.

I wish there was a reasonable way to get across to these content creators that people will give them a lot of money to actually deliver on the goods and it's because these people legitimately like them shy of simping for them - and that they shouldn't alienate their faithful subs by only delivering halfway for years on end.
She's been doing this for a few years now, there is no "slow walk". When you're doing borderline porn at this point the reluctance to show nudity is a combination of holding off for more money and just not being comfortable for whatever reason.

Props to Natalie Roush for doing topless stuff because her content is a lot more interesting for it even though she doesn't use sex toys like Christina Khalil does.
 
She's been doing this for a few years now, there is no "slow walk". When you're doing borderline porn at this point the reluctance to show nudity is a combination of holding off for more money and just not being comfortable for whatever reason.

Props to Natalie Roush for doing topless stuff because her content is a lot more interesting for it even though she doesn't use sex toys like Christina Khalil does.
Calling it a slow walk is drawing from the optimist in me that she'll eventually come around. Plus, how much more popular does she think she'll get? She's been at this for a while and it's not like she's the queen bee exactly - she's got enough competition that she'll eventually have to accept that she's either peaking or won't be able to eclipse other content creators unless she starts doing something different.

And yes to the Natalie Roush comment, I prefer her over Khalil because she's actually starting to get somewhere with her content in that we'll hopefully be seeing her pussy uncovered real soon. She also comes off as really happy to be doing what she's doing and happy to engage with her fans if she's being genuine.
 
next "Birthday editon" OF livestream is Sat Nov 12th 7PM EST, her OF livetreams are very entertaining and always worth watching, she uses 2 cameras in her livestreams, one of them for the live feed broadcast and the other for the post processing upload to her account (PPV), what we always see is the latter because no one records the live feed, I think it would be beneficial if this time someone records the live feed as it happens to get a second perspective in addition to the PPV version
 
next "Birthday editon" OF livestream is Sat Nov 12th 7PM EST, her OF livetreams are very entertaining and always worth watching, she uses 2 cameras in her livestreams, one of them for the live feed broadcast and the other for the post processing upload to her account (PPV), what we always see is the latter because no one records the live feed, I think it would be beneficial if this time someone records the live feed as it happens to get a second perspective in addition to the PPV version
Damn bruh, i always thought that those Livestreams were just recoded by one of the big spender ballers and then posted on or here. So these Livestream PPV's, are they edited? Or she posts them unedited? Fortunately, i haven't been following her for that long coz ive noticed she's been a teaser for years and only started using dildos and plugs in 2022.
 
not edited, the cameras are side by side so they record from a slightly different angle, the ppvs have the OF watermark in them, live recordings do not
 
Back
Top Bottom