I'm making this thread for a specific reason. In the process of trying to look into something, I went down a rabbit hole that you almost have to see to believe. So a few weeks ago, I clicked on a Mega folder that had access to a bunch of leaked nudes and porn of Bree Louise, the blonde Aussie TikTok girl.
However, what instantly startled me was that some of these files were dated from August or even July of 2019. According to Bree herself, her birthday is 4th September 2001, meaning she would've been underaged in these photos. In trying to verify this, I also stumbled across a from some guy who made a video (he took it down) where he said she was selling nudes as an underage girl. I immediately filed a report to this site to take down any material that they might suspect to be underage, which they did. On her main thread now, it says any material that isn't watermarked with her OF tag, but I also did some digging and found out that in Queensland, Australia (where she lives), you have to be 18 to get tattoes and nipple piercings like she has.
So that seemed to be it. But something about it felt off to me, so I decided to go fully Sherlock on this mother today and went through reddit tofind anything that might've been posted about her in mid 2019 that could verify this, because it seems weird to assume that someone would go out of their way to post nudes of themselves when they're underage especially since it's a crime! But I found a from a guy whose reddit account is now suspended who said she knew she was 18 and linked to proof. I'm not gonna repost the image here because idk if it counts as doxing and shit, but that seems real; she said herself on a recent tellonym post that her real last name isn't louise.
And the proof that this is legit: if you search up the name in that imgur image, the that comes up is an article about her getting arrested for having drugs. Same person in the pic, same job, same everything. It to an Australian business registry that lists someone with her legal name being a "Individual/Sole Trader" and living in the same part of the country and she is. So that seems 100% real at this point. But to get it back to the age thing: it says the same date of birth that she has - 4th September - but is says 2000 instead of 2001.
So what seems likely now that I looked at everything is that she lied about her age so she could say she made her OF "the day she turned 18", when in reality she already was 18. Really insane stuff.
However, what instantly startled me was that some of these files were dated from August or even July of 2019. According to Bree herself, her birthday is 4th September 2001, meaning she would've been underaged in these photos. In trying to verify this, I also stumbled across a from some guy who made a video (he took it down) where he said she was selling nudes as an underage girl. I immediately filed a report to this site to take down any material that they might suspect to be underage, which they did. On her main thread now, it says any material that isn't watermarked with her OF tag, but I also did some digging and found out that in Queensland, Australia (where she lives), you have to be 18 to get tattoes and nipple piercings like she has.
So that seemed to be it. But something about it felt off to me, so I decided to go fully Sherlock on this mother today and went through reddit tofind anything that might've been posted about her in mid 2019 that could verify this, because it seems weird to assume that someone would go out of their way to post nudes of themselves when they're underage especially since it's a crime! But I found a from a guy whose reddit account is now suspended who said she knew she was 18 and linked to proof. I'm not gonna repost the image here because idk if it counts as doxing and shit, but that seems real; she said herself on a recent tellonym post that her real last name isn't louise.
And the proof that this is legit: if you search up the name in that imgur image, the that comes up is an article about her getting arrested for having drugs. Same person in the pic, same job, same everything. It to an Australian business registry that lists someone with her legal name being a "Individual/Sole Trader" and living in the same part of the country and she is. So that seems 100% real at this point. But to get it back to the age thing: it says the same date of birth that she has - 4th September - but is says 2000 instead of 2001.
So what seems likely now that I looked at everything is that she lied about her age so she could say she made her OF "the day she turned 18", when in reality she already was 18. Really insane stuff.
