Honestly her response is pretty dumb and all over the place, it's just a random mash of uninformed ideas about art.
>Artists painting naked women and exploring female anatomy
Well sure, they did and still do, but well it doesn't take an expert to say that drawing parallels between an artistic nude and belle delphine's arsehole pics is the most forced stretch ever. Even when a piece is clearly about sex it's just so distant from online porn that you have to be so dumb to compare them - for example compare Klimt's sketches of women masturbating, with shaky linework that evokes the tremble of orgasm, and some nude vegana pic from any online whore. It's completely different stuff, and it has completely different purposes
>Promiscuous artists
I really don't see the connection here, and surely being promiscuous is pretty distant from diabolically exploiting a sex-addicted culture for monetary gain
Overall the whole thing is so bad taste, so kitsch it's ridiculous, and reminds me of mafiosi filling their houses with antiques and art pieces to show off, reducing them to mere aesthetics with no meaning, to mere background for more arsehole pics, and people are gobbling this stuff up. Also mafia has an ethos, online whores don't