Its the US dude... people won cases by killing their pets by putting them in the microwave because it wasn't specified in the instructions to not to.... You can win anything there. Especially if a real fraud took place like the ones she is commiting. You just have to find a good lawyer that just wants to win. It's because of exactly people like you who are so "who cares" that people like amouranth exist....If no one took this shit and called her out (or sued) she would either completely stop doing it or actually do porn just to avoid the backlash.
I mean, you could always buy something from her for a few bucks and sue her. Since that amount pales into insignificance to the attorney fees that you are dismissing etc, it'll be you who gets to win.
Agreed on the attractiveness part - I've long thought she looked good despite what she does to her customers.
Wouldn't surprise me if the various anons and posters in this thread have day jobs or acquired knowledge that give them some credibility towards what they're saying, depending on the subject. I've been edjimicated a bit in reading parts of this thread at times.
The OnlyFans ToS provides them all the cover they need, it says that creators are responsible for their content and not them. It's a standard get out that all sites like this have, so if it ever comes to a fight they've got no genuine liability.
Yes, I knew about the Terms of Service shit and nearly added a parenthetical reference to it after having read about it in this thread but also, I skimmed it a while back and saw it for myself. You're not wrong, but it doesn't change the fact that Onlyfans shields its brand ambassadors aka creators from making legitimate content. There's creators like Amouranth getting away with it and other weirdos using prosthetics and AI to sell their wares on Onlyfans, taking the scamming to a new level. Shit's fucked.
But if you win what do you claim? There's no damages or compensation to ask for. No one got hurt or injured or traumatised, no one lost time from work or lost some big investment opportunity or time away from their families, or anything.
Suppose the negative publicity would be enough to scare her into doing something legitimate for once? Good chance the Internet news outlets would pick up the story that she was being sued for falsely marketing her content.
Doubtful. Considering the damages were theoretically against one person and not a group. If she does have the net worth she claims she has, that's literal pocket change to her.
She'd probably be delighted to get the extra press, an instant unpaid advert for her OnlyFans. The amount of people signing up to see what it's all about would probably pay for 10 lawyers.
Then wait for the angry former subs to begin circulating information about her methods of scamming in more public forums - I think the outcomes you mention are probable but it'd be fun for the sake of watching the mudslinging and the ugliness come out that she might need to acknowledge.
If they got actual evidence of damages, it will be interesting to see how the case develops if they decide to sue. I don't care either way, its going to be fun to watch from outside.
I think we're finding out that the legal implications behind how far the case could go aren't the only barometer for how messy this could be and if the Internet press picks it up, all it takes is a loud enough collective voice to form to help corroborate what the (eventual/hopeful/possible) plaintiffs are suing for in the first place. That chorus speaks up and it'll change some minds even if they don't have any contribution towards the litigation - unless lawyers for the plaintiffs want to note that a lot of people are fired up online and there may be more people interested in joining the suit based on that.