I think it's been disclosed elsewhere in this thread that she's using eye-catching words like "HARDCORE" and "XXX" to draw in simps/customers when her content doesn't meet those definitions. This is false advertising and she should be pressured into making content that actually meets those definitions if she is going to be allowed to use those terms.
The problem that creators will have in "only releasing content that they're comfortable with" is that they'll eventually be eclipsed by other creators who are showing and doing more and therefore raking in more money. It's been noted either in this thread or another popular creator's thread that a small percentage of Onlyfans creators actually rake in the most money compared to the other creators - like 1% of the creators are the most successful and the other 99% bring in significantly less money. Under that paradigm, it's impossible for the average Barbie to bring in Amouranth-level numbers since there are probable thousands of other Barbies on Onlyfans trying to hustle. Unless they have a smaller market cornered or found a genius way to ensnare their audience/subs, they can't charge exorbitant prices for everyday pornographic acts such as masturbation, sex or general nakedness since there are thousands of other Barbies doing the same thing and only so much coin for men to spend on their favorite creators.
Your Amouranths, Nigris, Roushes, Turneys and so on are going to be in a very elite, small class of creators that were successful/visible before they joined Onlyfans and now they've made the platform their oyster with Amouranth being the queen bee as the most successful despite only having been on it for a very short time. Most of the 99% are women probably coasting on their attractiveness but in some cases also using it to pay the bills or pad out their lifestyles. If you remember the uproar when Bella Thorne joined Onlyfans (and is still producing implied nudes instead of the stuff Onlyfans is known for), far less famous creators were pissed because Thorne was a known actress who was potentially siphoning away business from them since her name is a brand in and of itself.
If we're going to rank these thousands of creators based on how much skin they're willing to show and their willingness/unwillingness to masturbate or perform sex acts on camera, the ones who are only going partially nude/only posing in bras or skimpy clothes will not be making very much because horny men will happily throw more generous amounts of coin at pretty ladies doing and showing what they want to see. This is also why it seems very sanctimonious if a creator is going to set hard limits in their bios of what they won't do or stating ONLY what they'll do (STPeach for example stating she doesn't do nudes, "so don't ask") since Onlyfans is a very porn-centric platform. If a creator doesn't want to go nude or film sex acts, they should stick to Patreon or Instagram and leave Onlyfans to more willing creators instead of half-assing content and taking away from other, better creators who could make a name for themselves if it wasn't for the elite 1% of creators coasting on their name/previous success.
