My point is the idea of “proof” in this context is a false construct, so you shouldn’t chase it.
Yes, no matter what you ask of the model, the agency will pass onto the model whatever requests of yours that they can't handle themselves, like a video message of her saying your name. Although with AI they could possibly produce those types of videos now too.....not to be too negative but at this point, trust nobody on OF. Seems like OF is ok with models doing this sort of fraud on their "customers".
One person’s “extreme” is another’s “pragmatic and realistic”.
What kind of questions?
lol what is your point? we would all do the same thing if we could passively earn money. that's the whole point of work right? earn income to enjoy experiences. if they can do that and horny guys still send them money without complaining about quality--why not do it?
I think the point is that there are no checks and balances against those types of accounts. They can blissfully exist without oversight or transparency. With the exception of some unofficial efforts to provide a ratings/review forum, these platforms will never implement an official review system. If they did, creators would be flooded with 1 star reviews - most likely deserved, but sure, there would also be overly passionate reviews from the smallest sleight. And more importantly, the money would slow down. Can't have that!
OnlyFans would be 5x better if there were ratings and stats like percentage of re-subs, percentage of people buying more than one piece of content.
Unless an OF model explicitly says “I answer every message myself”…customers aren’t being misled by the model…they’re deluding themselves, then trying to project blame onto the model.
Such reviews are *going* to happen. You see this everywhere a review system is implemented when someone gets salty. But that shouldn't prevent implementing one altogether. Reviews can be moderated under a site's terms and conditions and this is done just about everywhere online these days. Reviews should not be considered a deterrent (but rather a boon) towards sales unless you know you're selling a crappy product.
It seems his point flew over your head. and you didn't understand it, cause he wasn't talking about if it's ethical or not. That is what you wanted to bring up for some reason. He was just talking about how none of these girls seem capable of running an Onlyfans and have zero work effort. So the agencies are a necessary evil.
Wow, and I thought women were the drama queens.
A few pornstars & other OF girls use Fanscout for fans to review their OF
His post did not have a point and certainly didn't hint towards ethics. That's you trying to insert your thoughts into his post to make it stronger.
No one is claiming a review system *can’t* be implemented…there’s just no business incentive to do so.
That’s a stretch.
There are "CRM" systems for OF, don't think they are officially allowed by OF, that have functionality to adjust pricing based on spending but I don't think they are able to cross-match if you have multiple accounts but maybe it looks at spend across all the creators that use the CRM system.