Simp Chat Scarlett Howard - Discussion Thread

[tirawad737]

It seems she thinks when price is such a high, the buyers are less likely to leak the content because if you buy something expensive, you want to keep it to yourself. But in any case a price for two photos 170 dollars is madness when incomprehensible that there.
Even if she is planning making topless contents, until more conversations and reflections than actions. Not very convincing ...

 

[erik93se]

Anyone subscribing to her totally nude $75 gallery?

 

[UKLover]

Anyone subscribing to her totally nude $75 gallery?

Nah, would be burned as usual

 

[erik93se]

Has anyone purchased the latest $10 shower video?

 

[Yojimb0]

When was it sent as I can't see any having been sent lately and what is the preview of it? She has a few shower vids

 

[UKLover]

I haven't received any shower vids recently so maybe a discounted one that we've bought at full price

 

[Domonicvd]

Yeah it was an old one that she reduced for the first ten buyers

 

[Yojimb0]

That's the last shower one I can see having been sent out a few months back

 

[UKLover]

That's the last shower one I can see having been sent out a few months back

Same here

 

[erik93se]

That's the last shower one I can see having been sent out a few months back

Yeah that's the one.
Has it already been uploaded in the main thread? i've only seen the tropical outdoor one.

 

[Yojimb0]

I haven't uploaded it and by the looks of it no one else has. Then again, there's more leeches in her thread than there are posters

 

[erik93se]

I haven't uploaded it and by the looks of it no one else has. Then again, there's more leeches in her thread than there are posters

Thanks for uploading it to the main thread. Much appreciated

 

[sausagefingerslouie]

Why is she so damn protective of her nipples? Anyone who's seen her page 3 photo has seen them.
If she wouldn't grossly overcharge for prudishly dancing around exposing her full breasts, I would've stayed a subscriber.

 

[tirawad737]

If nipples are covered or not directly shown then it doesn't count as real nudity it only falls under the lewd content. It is implied nudity.
Her nipples are always covered that do her actions more decent.

 

[UKLover]

To be fair, going by the tip bars on her posts, she's making decent money as it is so there's no real need for her to go topless if she's making enough money through non topless work

 

[Yojimb0]

As much as I would love for her to do fully topless content (at a reasonable price!!!) I still enjoy the content she puts out. There will come a point though where she'll need to up the ante, may not be soon but these careers still have a shelf life and cashing in will be the best option. I think it's more the fact that there is already topless content out there (and going by posts and messages she's sent, she knows they are on here), I just don't see what the big deal is. She was more than happy to get them out to become a page 3 girl so what's changed?

 

[Sloagher]

As much as I would love for her to do fully topless content (at a reasonable price!!!) I still enjoy the content she puts out. There will come a point though where she'll need to up the ante, may not be soon but these careers still have a shelf life and cashing in will be the best option. I think it's more the fact that there is already topless content out there (and going by posts and messages she's sent, she knows they are on here), I just don't see what the big deal is. She was more than happy to get them out to become a page 3 girl so what's changed?

It doesn’t make sense since her apparent health issues seemingly stop her having consistent work, so she’ll never get proper acting gigs and any radio work will be sparse, so having nudes isn’t jeopardising much in the way of career prospects

It has to be a defence mechanism so she can justify it to herself - “I’m not nude so it’s not the same as the rest of them”.

People need to stop paying if they want change