Onehushhush
Bathwater Drinker
- Mar 12, 2022
- 192
- 1,766
If we got like 10 of us together we could easily leak every single one of her ppv's. There's just no interest. It's not the price, it's the content.
Simp Chat QueenTofu
- Thread starter LurkinJerkin
- Start date
Balleballe
Diamond Tier
- Mar 11, 2022
- 73
- 832
I get your point, but its so contradictive to say "i dont want to make money of this" while charging 100$ for 4 pictures that she said the takes "for the fun of it"
baybeast89
Tier 2 Sub
- Mar 15, 2022
- 18
- 178
Exactly
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
People need to just stop with this she doesn't do it for the money argument. As I've previously stated, her 180 from "that wasn't cool leaking my shit" to charging exorbitant prices already proves it's for money (spite charging).
And if you don't buy into that, how about this: Let's say her price tag was some preemptive anti-piracy model and not just simply greed or an inflated ego. Then why, oh WHY did she go and fucking DOUBLE the price of an alleged anti-piracy measure that was ALREADY working (none of her sets leaked prior to the price hike)? Oh, yeah, because she got greedy and wants more.
She's apparently lowered it to $75 now and has a wishlist is what I'm hearing from some of you. Idc about the wishlist because it's a choice. Wanna be a sheep? Buy her something. But the $75 price is still ridiculous for what's on offer. And to the people who defend shit like that with "she knows her worth" just stop with your modern day excusatory practices. Female content creators are the only group of people who get away with that BS.
Imagine if McDonald's came out tomorrow charging $50 for a hamburger. And when grilled about it they just said "Well, we're one of the biggest chains on earth and we stand by our quality, so we feel we know our product's worth." Translation: "Fuck you, pay us or starve".
Everything she does is for profit. Is that bad? No. Do I feel she's lazy as all hell and trying to make the most easy money she can? Yes. Can't blame her for it though. Humans weren't put on this earth to work. Any easy money you can get, go for it. But, women have it easy in the money department. The concept of currency is the shittiest invention humans have ever come up with. It enslaves us all. So, when one group has easy access to it with low effort when most people have to break their backs for it, there's bound to be jealousy and judgement.
Sometimes this is fair, sometimes it is not. In Tori's case, I feel it's fair because there are many sex workers (I know she's not one nor wants to be one) who do way more, show way more and charge way less. I'm talking $25 for a 25 minute clip with nudity and penetration. And these women are not dumb. They're educated, successful living in great houses and I'm sure they "know their worth". But, even they know charging outrageous prices for low effort shit is bad business. Unless they're FinDommes, they try to charge reasonably.
Tori does not do this and doesn't seem to care either. She seems to have a price she will not go below. I would say this is stupid business, seeing as how every forum I see her mentioned on people laugh at her prices and call her crazy. But you know what? She's paying her bills so who gives a shit?
The last point I'll present is this: Victoria is a human being. Deserving of love, compassion and understanding. However, we don't see or KNOW Victoria. We see Queentofu and Queentofu is a product. A product to be weighed and measured against similar products. And in that regard, she is as ridiculous as a $50,000 priced 20 inch LCD TV. She's not dumb, she KNOWS she's overcharging. So please, no more "she isn't scamming or doing it for the money" talk.
And if you don't buy into that, how about this: Let's say her price tag was some preemptive anti-piracy model and not just simply greed or an inflated ego. Then why, oh WHY did she go and fucking DOUBLE the price of an alleged anti-piracy measure that was ALREADY working (none of her sets leaked prior to the price hike)? Oh, yeah, because she got greedy and wants more.
She's apparently lowered it to $75 now and has a wishlist is what I'm hearing from some of you. Idc about the wishlist because it's a choice. Wanna be a sheep? Buy her something. But the $75 price is still ridiculous for what's on offer. And to the people who defend shit like that with "she knows her worth" just stop with your modern day excusatory practices. Female content creators are the only group of people who get away with that BS.
Imagine if McDonald's came out tomorrow charging $50 for a hamburger. And when grilled about it they just said "Well, we're one of the biggest chains on earth and we stand by our quality, so we feel we know our product's worth." Translation: "Fuck you, pay us or starve".
Everything she does is for profit. Is that bad? No. Do I feel she's lazy as all hell and trying to make the most easy money she can? Yes. Can't blame her for it though. Humans weren't put on this earth to work. Any easy money you can get, go for it. But, women have it easy in the money department. The concept of currency is the shittiest invention humans have ever come up with. It enslaves us all. So, when one group has easy access to it with low effort when most people have to break their backs for it, there's bound to be jealousy and judgement.
Sometimes this is fair, sometimes it is not. In Tori's case, I feel it's fair because there are many sex workers (I know she's not one nor wants to be one) who do way more, show way more and charge way less. I'm talking $25 for a 25 minute clip with nudity and penetration. And these women are not dumb. They're educated, successful living in great houses and I'm sure they "know their worth". But, even they know charging outrageous prices for low effort shit is bad business. Unless they're FinDommes, they try to charge reasonably.
Tori does not do this and doesn't seem to care either. She seems to have a price she will not go below. I would say this is stupid business, seeing as how every forum I see her mentioned on people laugh at her prices and call her crazy. But you know what? She's paying her bills so who gives a shit?
The last point I'll present is this: Victoria is a human being. Deserving of love, compassion and understanding. However, we don't see or KNOW Victoria. We see Queentofu and Queentofu is a product. A product to be weighed and measured against similar products. And in that regard, she is as ridiculous as a $50,000 priced 20 inch LCD TV. She's not dumb, she KNOWS she's overcharging. So please, no more "she isn't scamming or doing it for the money" talk.
Last edited:
Dingo009988
Bathwater Drinker
- May 23, 2022
- 50
- 3,979
Any creator on fanhouse do it exclusively for the money because of their supposedly leak proof system. tofu still has her price at $100, some at $75 but it’s for 1 image now lol. Her fanhouse is built only for her loyal loyalll fans or there’s no shot she would charge these unexplainable amounts.
she wouldn’t have shown up and commenting on here if “it wasn’t about the money.”
she wouldn’t have shown up and commenting on here if “it wasn’t about the money.”
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
Just a quick addition to my argument. If her goal is to not make "lots" of money and as stated above just have a few loyal people sustain her income, fair play. I'm merely pointing out that we don't know that. Yes, even if she herself said it, we just don't know.
People say lots of disingenuous things. Not saying she's for sure disingenuous, just reminding people that you have to consider all possible agendas and intentions. Getting tunnel vision and saying that something is for sure THIS way is a bad practice. And outright believing people at face value is the worst practice.
People say lots of disingenuous things. Not saying she's for sure disingenuous, just reminding people that you have to consider all possible agendas and intentions. Getting tunnel vision and saying that something is for sure THIS way is a bad practice. And outright believing people at face value is the worst practice.
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
I don't understand how it's leak proof. I read somewhere that they cover an entire photo with a watermark. If that's the case, can't people just use third party tools to remove them like they have been for years?Any creator on fanhouse do it exclusively for the money because of their supposedly leak proof system. tofu still has her price at $100, some at $75 but it’s for 1 image now lol. Her fanhouse is built only for her loyal loyalll fans or there’s no shot she would charge these unexplainable amounts.
she wouldn’t have shown up and commenting on here if “it wasn’t about the money.”
Dingo009988
Bathwater Drinker
- May 23, 2022
- 50
- 3,979
Probably, there’s no one on fanhouse that I’m particularly interested in subscribing to check it out. im sure it can be edited out as well
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
Just looked it up again on their twitter and found the convo. They say they track leakers down and fine them (yeah, sure bud) and a creator owned their ass in the replies. She said "unless they remove your watermark then you offer 0 help". They then procede to say they can't do jack shit if someone removes their watermark because they cant prove ownership. Oh, and they say the watermark is inserted server side and does cover the entire photo. If you try to screenshot, download or obtain the image in any way, it's there.
So, if anyone ever leaks this guaranteed mid shit she puts out, make sure you're skilled at removing watermarks with editing software or the internet police will show up to your house. You don' GOOFED!
Dingo009988
Bathwater Drinker
- May 23, 2022
- 50
- 3,979
Ya I’ve seen a watermark image of another creator. It covers so much of the image, it’s insulting to their users lmaoooo
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
The people who created Fanhouse must be former game devs. They want you to go digital and not actually own the thing you payed for. Wtf are people supposed to do? Let it sit in their account and log in every time they wanna fap? What happens when the business inevitably goes under?
If you have a Fanhouse account you NEED editing software. Double charge. I can see why Tori loves them. Kindred spirits.
I just want to quickly say I agree with all these points. I realized after posting that I got a bit side tracked from the point I was trying to make, which was she clearly isn't trying to make OF level of money which a few people here kept saying she was trying to do. The confusion of reading that, got me a little scatter brained.
I honestly dont think she needs to worry about her ppv's being leaked because I dont think anybody here is gona spend that kind of money for what you get i mean if she did $50 and like 15-20 photos hell I'd probably buy that ppv but not gona spend $75 for 2-6 pics
BananaBonanza
Lurker
- Oct 8, 2022
- 2
- 14
True, but you also sorely underestimate how down bad we are.
I mean, some of these girls are upcharging like crazy and when people are horny they'll pay anything.
jintypopsweetybungabing
Tier 3 Sub
- Jun 22, 2022
- 16
- 385
Self respecting non idiots dont pay anything especially when you have to pay $15 a month just to have the right to pay a premium for less than a handful of pictures, she needs to start doing videos also and larger picture sets and set a more realistic price if she wants any longevity.
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
Here's what I think she should do. But I'm a know nothing, so I'm sure people, including her will disagree.
$40 sets with 4-5 pics and at least 1 VIDEO. The video obviously would not be pornographic like most here want, but it's 2022. JUST pictures, especially at premium rate is just clown shit. The video would be 1:30-2:00 of her modeling the lingerie, maybe getting into the positions shown in the pics, maybe a few bonus poses. She should accentuate her butt more, as I feel it's her best feature and was one of my main gripes with her previous sets. She's now corrected this with the Halloween set, which is great. I don't know Fanhouse's rules about how spicy you can get, so Idk if doggy is off the table or if she's even comfortable with it (which is fair), just a thought. Of course there's always going to be people going "$40 for this!? She needs to get in pretzel poses and take a 12 inch dildo in her ass for that price"! Ignore these idiots. You can be a hard tease and please people without going full porn mode.
Onto her "no leaks" ultimatum: I respect that it's her body, but this is a detrimental attitude. Maybe someday, someone will buy a set, take the time to go into photoshop, remove watermarks if possible and spread it here or or wherever. If she then goes back to $100 3 pic sets, then what was the point of defending yourself, asking for the desires of potential customers if the attitude is "fuck you, I'll do what I want anyway"?
Here's the thing. About 90% of the people here are not her customers. If we went through the trouble of finding these sites, making accounts and watching threads, obviously we are the people who do not. Pay. For porn. Ever. She may as well of asked "what do you guys want in sets?" on her Fanhouse page to the people who will actually buy it.
Lastly, she shouldn't care about leaks. I know you can argue "if she charges less and ignores leaks, that's potentially thousands of lost sales". No it's not. Not when it comes to the people here. They wouldn't pay 10 dollars. I can understand going after people who leak it on Reddit or Twitter, but this site takes at least a little initiative to find and interact with. Besides, as the saying goes "don't build your house on sand" and she hasn't. She has that bedrock of loyal simps who will buy EVERYTHING she does. If that bedrock pays her bills and buys her meals then don't focus on the small group of fucks on a leak site. Focus on putting out CONSISTENT and QUALITY content to amass even more loyal, paying customers.
She has the consistency down. Every 19th, a set comes out. Now focus on fair pricing and enough sexy content. And as I said, she should ignore leaks for her sanity. Let her loyal whales pay her bills and just focus on gaining more customers with consistent, quality stuff. That reddit leak reaaally got to her feelings. But she has to accept, leakers will always be a thing. You just have to combat them with a big enough fanbase that your income doesn't get affected much. And unfortunately, every time I see a new person comment on a thread it's "WHO is she? She's charging WHAT? For THIS"? She doesn't have good word of mouth, but this October was a small step in the right direction. Just needs fine-tuning.
Last edited:
jintypopsweetybungabing
Tier 3 Sub
- Jun 22, 2022
- 16
- 385
The picture was a small step in the right direction in terms of showing a bit more, but the pricing will never snowball it will stagnate because only the biggest losers will pay for it.
A lowering of price, including vids and more content for the price and acceptance that leaking is inevitable will gain her way more in the long run.
She is 1000% doing it for money and therefore saying she doesnt want more of it is not correct if anyone believes that.
Also the bark is stronger than the bite as far as the "leakproof" encrypting on the fanhouse content, onlyfans has the same shit but still gets leaked no problem, if the creator isnt very wealthy they dont pursue anything because it costs them money in lawyers fees and court and its hard to prove even with encryption that the leaker is responsible.
once a month isnt really consistant enough also id argue, considering the amount of free time she has, also whoever is the photographer has a really shit resolution camera for the job.
A lowering of price, including vids and more content for the price and acceptance that leaking is inevitable will gain her way more in the long run.
She is 1000% doing it for money and therefore saying she doesnt want more of it is not correct if anyone believes that.
Also the bark is stronger than the bite as far as the "leakproof" encrypting on the fanhouse content, onlyfans has the same shit but still gets leaked no problem, if the creator isnt very wealthy they dont pursue anything because it costs them money in lawyers fees and court and its hard to prove even with encryption that the leaker is responsible.
once a month isnt really consistant enough also id argue, considering the amount of free time she has, also whoever is the photographer has a really shit resolution camera for the job.
LurkinJerkin
Fan
- Mar 26, 2022
- 34
- 73
I'm being nice because I've considered who we're dealing with. She's stated she has ADHD and hyperfixations and A, B, C, D. Once a month is good for her. And themed sets, kind of like a seasonal/calendar model may not be a shitload of content, but once again, perfect for her. Not even worth fighting her over it. I've also stated I feel she has a set price and content model she will not go above or below. My $40 4-5 pic, 1 video model is just wishful thinking and sort of a best case scenario considering her stances she's demonstrated.
And I'm sure me saying to ignore leaks would make her dry heave but I'm basing that on bigger models who have that sustainable fanbase to not care. If she focuses on acquiring one, maybe she won't give a fuck about leaks if she's making bank anyway. But, then again, hyperfixations and it just feels like she has a major bone to pick with leakers because of the Reddit fiasco. She may just be incapable of ignoring it due to a held grudge.
He says while he tips fedora...Understatement of the year.