Long story short: its to do with regulatory compliance. MV follows 18 U.S.C. 2257 which requires all performers (additional to the main model, including co-models) featured in adult videos to fill in a MV Co-Model agreement form.
The form requires name and photo of proof of ID next to the participants face (just the same as Pornhub), something impossible to do with genuine members of the public who did not provide consent to be included in the video. If these rules are not followed then the models account will be terminated, these platforms are getting very strict as the penalties affect them directly and not the model. See the rules here:
. Look at section 1 specifically, even people who walk in the background are counted as participants.
A consequence of this is that some videos are not posted on MV but are on FC, due to not meeting compliance as they are genuine and involve 'interactions' with random strangers, ("
Pt 1 and 2", "
", "
", "
") are some examples.
These videos are some of her best performing ones (sales wise), so she loses out when not being able to post them onto MV.
FC Europe is in Netherlands and requires that identities of non performers be hidden (blurred, cropped, voices muted, etc...). FC doesn't (so far) require consent from people in the background (i.e. they won't terminate a models account for this). FC does and has blocked MasterCard and VISA payments for public content that doesn't have background peoples consent, see the message at the top of NGG's FC page on how to pay as FC blocked these 2 credit card companies on her account (she couldn't provide consent for her non-staged videos involving strangers). See here on FC compliance:
.
Has anyone else noticed that in the non-staged scenarios she mainly only goes nude in front of older people...
The videos in which she 'interacts' with people and are posted on MV are staged ("Pizza delivery", "Followed X Following", "Left dress at train station", "Night vision in town", "naked hitchhiker with destroyed clothes", "Everything flashed for sales girl", both of the "Burning clothes", etc...), so the people she interacts with must fill in the form to comply with the rules. She has also not been promoting her MV on twitter and instead directs new subscribers to her new site "secretorgasmproject". Just to be clear, MV does allow videos with the public/random strangers in them as long as they are at a distance and not identifiable, i.e. "Sunset beach" is allowed (the people are 100m + far away) - but notice how she changes the title to "Sunset beach (with some people around)" on FC.
Its clear to me that her new site secretorgasmproject is a way to try and get mainstream credit card providers payments back in place, as her customers have to go through random companies to pay and she may be losing out on revenue. Her new site is on mymembers.site platform and they allow CCBill which has done adult content for decades.
Some of her paying fans question the genuine nature of the latest video on MV and FC, we'll see if she deletes the comments like previously...