Simp Chat NaughtyGardenGirl DISCUSSION

srtkenni

Tier 2 Sub
Sep 12, 2023
6
184
383
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
It's just that her last few videos are public, but have little risk behind them. Sometimes you look at the previews of a video, you already think a lot of things, but in fact there ....
 

Pedrojota

Tier 3 Sub
Sep 23, 2022
6
425
600
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Like a cinema trailer, you think that movie is amazing, but after is bored,There is some risk, but between her weight gain and the lies she spread about her collaborating friends, who knows how much longer she will last...
 

roseterminal

Lurker
Sep 23, 2022
1
2
380
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
I just prefer daylight, fully naked. this wasn't that. it's okay, it just wasn't for me. I'm not worried about anything else. she's always made vids that didn't tick my boxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harissonfabro

RobertS924

Tier 3 Sub
Mar 24, 2023
7
468
600
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Does anyone have the Funny Bunny Easter Game videos? I've seen links to them in other fourms but theyre all dead links would be appriciated if someone could upload 🙏🙏
 

jalobil715

Lurker
Mar 6, 2024
0
16
7
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes

Long story short: its to do with regulatory compliance. MV follows 18 U.S.C. 2257 which requires all performers (additional to the main model, including co-models) featured in adult videos to fill in a MV Co-Model agreement form.
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images

The form requires name and photo of proof of ID next to the participants face (just the same as Pornhub), something impossible to do with genuine members of the public who did not provide consent to be included in the video. If these rules are not followed then the models account will be terminated, these platforms are getting very strict as the penalties affect them directly and not the model. See the rules here:
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
. Look at section 1 specifically, even people who walk in the background are counted as participants.

A consequence of this is that some videos are not posted on MV but are on FC, due to not meeting compliance as they are genuine and involve 'interactions' with random strangers, ("
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
Pt 1 and 2", "
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
", "
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
", "
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
") are some examples. These videos are some of her best performing ones (sales wise), so she loses out when not being able to post them onto MV.
FC Europe is in Netherlands and requires that identities of non performers be hidden (blurred, cropped, voices muted, etc...). FC doesn't (so far) require consent from people in the background (i.e. they won't terminate a models account for this). FC does and has blocked MasterCard and VISA payments for public content that doesn't have background peoples consent, see the message at the top of NGG's FC page on how to pay as FC blocked these 2 credit card companies on her account (she couldn't provide consent for her non-staged videos involving strangers). See here on FC compliance:
Please, Log in or Register to see links and images
.

Has anyone else noticed that in the non-staged scenarios she mainly only goes nude in front of older people...

The videos in which she 'interacts' with people and are posted on MV are staged ("Pizza delivery", "Followed X Following", "Left dress at train station", "Night vision in town", "naked hitchhiker with destroyed clothes", "Everything flashed for sales girl", both of the "Burning clothes", etc...), so the people she interacts with must fill in the form to comply with the rules. She has also not been promoting her MV on twitter and instead directs new subscribers to her new site "secretorgasmproject". Just to be clear, MV does allow videos with the public/random strangers in them as long as they are at a distance and not identifiable, i.e. "Sunset beach" is allowed (the people are 100m + far away) - but notice how she changes the title to "Sunset beach (with some people around)" on FC.

Its clear to me that her new site secretorgasmproject is a way to try and get mainstream credit card providers payments back in place, as her customers have to go through random companies to pay and she may be losing out on revenue. Her new site is on mymembers.site platform and they allow CCBill which has done adult content for decades.

Some of her paying fans question the genuine nature of the latest video on MV and FC, we'll see if she deletes the comments like previously...
 
Last edited:

roseterminal

Lurker
Sep 23, 2022
1
2
380
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
I think the lamest thing is running in and making sure everyone knows it's staged.
fist of all, let people who don't read the MV fine print enjoy the fantasy. that's what pornography is for.

second, I'm not sure anyone's going to flip out and take down a video over part of a shoe showing up. that's not a person who's being represented on film, it's half a shoe.

anyway, naked, daylight, nature. I enjoyed it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: madxo

srtkenni

Tier 2 Sub
Sep 12, 2023
6
184
383
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
There is some truth in your words. However, I have a question. for example, who prevents you from using a friend to confirm your identity in clips where it is impossible to clearly determine who is in the frame, since there is no face. Although it is certainly easier to create a staged video, there is always a way to find a loophole in the rules.
 

jalobil715

Lurker
Mar 6, 2024
0
16
7
0fya082315al84db03fa9bf467e3.png
Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
I understand your point, but that wouldn't be a loophole - that would just be not following the law/rules that the platform must comply with. If the performer is going to go to the extent of getting a friend or other content creator to submit their identity to the platform and pretend to a member(s) of the public that featured or were in the background of the video, then that friend/creator would already know that you make this type of content (would have seen you nude etc.) so there is no way to hide the purpose of requiring a copy of their ID/signing forms.

At that point it would be logical to have your friend act as a stranger in the video, that way you can retake as many times, there wouldn't be any 'danger', and they could also assist on the production (making sure camera angles are correct (to only show shoes), act as a lookout, etc...).

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
My intention was not to break anyone's fantasy. Reading through this thread, even back in 2022, people has surmised (based on the video content alone) that there were staged videos and non-staged videos.

Please, Log in or Register to view quotes
You then asked for me to justify my response, which I did.
I assumed everyone was aware of this - I just gave my opinion based on the video content and my work brain switched on to read the platform rules and followed the logic that the video being posted to MV implied that it was a staged one.

I didn't want to further bore the reader, but I did have a chapter on how the scenarios in her videos aren't real (but a fantasy) and also how she stages past videos and with who - but that would give an insight into an aspect of NGGs life and reveal details that she doesn't share with her fans.
 
Last edited: