EXCLUSIVE OFFER - WATCH CAMSODA GIRLS LIVE FOR FREE!!! - CLICK HERE
  • We have blocked access to our website from TOR nodes and a datacenter in France (some VPN connections to the country might be faulty) due to abusive behaviour. If things quiet down - they'll be enabled again in a few days/weeks.

Discussion Girls you lost interest in?

I mean it’s just ones I’ve lost interest in not that you had too.
I remember my ex girlfriend freaking out about all the Ariana Grande controversy last year. Apparently shes a proud homewrecker and has multiple songs singing about happily stealing a girls man. haha.

You would think she was a woman rapper.
 
Mostly what I was going with here, should have been slightly more specific. I still don't like when the girl is covered in ink to the point where you can barely tell her skin color anymore, but it's mostly a matter of what + how much + does it fit.

For example, Christy Mack looked hardcore enough to justify some ink on her body. But then you have these porcelain white, princess looking girls, fitting up sleeves and boob chandeliers, shit that makes barely any sense. It just ruins the girl.

My worst example of that though, is an old suicidegirl I was a big fan off. Redhead, petite, unfortunately I can't remember her name anymore, she had the right amount and quality of ink in her body. One fateful day, she comes up with a new tattoo, a dude looking at you from her pubis. And not just any dude, JESUS. Mind you I'm not a religious man by any means, quite the opposite, but fapping to her became absolutely unbearable, when she would spread her legs and a dude would be there staring straight at you. She clearly did that one to gross people out, and have no fucking doubt that it worked.

P.S.: Decided to try and find her, Maud Suicide if you want to check her. She ruined herself beyond recognition. Painted over her natural red hair, filled her body completely with ink, sacrificed her cute face to plastic surgery fillers, gained some weight (not enough to make her gross, but enough to move her out of petite). My dick weeps.
Well, I laughed a lot of the way you have putted the context. Gave a try to research and I think I could have seem this girl in particular in some generic porn site many years ago, and yeah, I liked the tattoos but certainly I can easily imagine how this new one alone can destroy everything.
 
Jillian Janson.

Between 2014-2016 she was legitimately one of the prettiest girls to ever do porn, she looked like she could be the Princess of Monaco, Queen of Luxembourg or something like that.

But since then she's gotten SO skinny and SO pale that I'm completely turned off. Nowadays whenever I see a (newer) scene of hers pop up I don't even click it anymore. But man, that Jillian from 10 years ago was something else...
 
Incrementally, anytime they get tattoos. Very visible ones or Surgery? it's game over.

Hannah Owo, bunni3png and Belle for a while, although she someone magically reverse it which I still don't understand. I keep archive of their old stuff but unwatch their thread.
 
Makoshake will not have my attention again until she adds audio to her POV simulation videos. They were mindblowing the first few times, even without audio. But now? After seeing 20 vids shot in the same style with no audio to differentiate them? Nah

I just wish there were other super hot creators who would do the same angles as her but with audio.
 
Makoshake will not have my attention again until she adds audio to her POV simulation videos. They were mindblowing the first few times, even without audio. But now? After seeing 20 vids shot in the same style with no audio to differentiate them? Nah

I just wish there were other super hot creators who would do the same angles as her but with audio.
True. I do think she's just smart about it is minimizing risk of OF affecting her life. She has the most insane body and face. She's my number 1 but I agree that we wouldn't lose much if she just stopped posting with what she doing now.
 
Spookykins. She either switched to an agency starting this month, or switched agencies, and it's just sad.
Yep her account is fucking awful now. You can even recognize the same DMs word for word being sent by other models

Edit: I asked her and she got defensive in broken English and changed the subject lmao her account is absolutely run by the same agency that runs all these accounts now.
 
Last edited:
Jillian Janson.

Between 2014-2016 she was legitimately one of the prettiest girls to ever do porn, she looked like she could be the Princess of Monaco, Queen of Luxembourg or something like that.

But since then she's gotten SO skinny and SO pale that I'm completely turned off. Nowadays whenever I see a (newer) scene of hers pop up I don't even click it anymore. But man, that Jillian from 10 years ago was something else...
Is she still active? Checked her thread and all I found was her old stuff.
 
shyybaaby (a cam girl on cb/stripchat) and other girls who do something similar, such as Kira____ on livejasmine. I have not seen this before but there are a few young and very beautiful girls who seem to get away with either straight scamming or almost scamming. Maybe I am not just old and not up to date with how cam sites work anymore, but it used to be that if you went into a private show, they would just show whatever it is they show. Some might have a rule that they won't show their vagina. Some might have a 'pre-tip' if they were really hot and wouldn't do a private unless you sent that first.

But this is a new thing with a few of these girls where they imply that their private is going to be a real private, but it's not, it's just a tease in underwear, not explicit at all. Then if you want more, they will imply you can get nudity, or straight up lie and say you will get nudity, if you tip an additional 1000 tokens or whatever. Then you tip that and find out, they meant they will finally show their ass sure, but if you want actual doggie position, it's another 1000 tokens.

The Kira_ girl implied her VIP show was nude, then found out it was not even really topless. Said nude was 25 credits more (like $30), paid that, then oh sorry I meant 25 more for topless. For nude will be another 50.

I have no problem with no nude girls, and they can be very erotic even if they just play with their tits inside of their clothes or practically anything, especially since some of them are so young and hot. But when you trick me, or straight up scam me, then I have a problem. Is this a new thing to get guys in private and then just start demanding higher and higher amounts, implying you will get nude/explicit or just straight lying and saying you will?

I guess it seems like some shy new girls are legitimately nervous about being naked, but still want money, so they just trick people into sending tokens by saying they will do stuff, but decide they are 'too shy' at the last minute.

The one girl after I basically threatened to complain to the site support finally did take her underwear off, but not until I explained like three times how she was being deceptive and then said something about support.

I think it's great if girls want to preserve their dignity and not be explicit or whatever, just not okay to lie and scam people.
 
Katyuska Moonfox. I think it's the tattoo. I'm fine with tattoo, but if it's covering a big part of your body... yeah i'm not ready for that.

10476274_884227528258522_5585705700140883648_naaa7e50ee565945c.md.jpg GFC7drka4AAZHx37ae4e089df847620.md.jpg

I dropped her a few years back too, the tattoo wasn't even that big by then (and I'm with you on this, it looks terrible). My problem with her was that she kept bimbo-ing up, but the content was not bimbo worthy for lack of a better description. She was doing GFE teasing content, while looking like a vegas whore. At a certain point I just couldn't follow her anymore.
 
shyybaaby (a cam girl on cb/stripchat) and other girls who do something similar, such as Kira____ on livejasmine. I have not seen this before but there are a few young and very beautiful girls who seem to get away with either straight scamming or almost scamming. Maybe I am not just old and not up to date with how cam sites work anymore, but it used to be that if you went into a private show, they would just show whatever it is they show. Some might have a rule that they won't show their vagina. Some might have a 'pre-tip' if they were really hot and wouldn't do a private unless you sent that first.

But this is a new thing with a few of these girls where they imply that their private is going to be a real private, but it's not, it's just a tease in underwear, not explicit at all. Then if you want more, they will imply you can get nudity, or straight up lie and say you will get nudity, if you tip an additional 1000 tokens or whatever. Then you tip that and find out, they meant they will finally show their ass sure, but if you want actual doggie position, it's another 1000 tokens.

The Kira_ girl implied her VIP show was nude, then found out it was not even really topless. Said nude was 25 credits more (like $30), paid that, then oh sorry I meant 25 more for topless. For nude will be another 50.

I have no problem with no nude girls, and they can be very erotic even if they just play with their tits inside of their clothes or practically anything, especially since some of them are so young and hot. But when you trick me, or straight up scam me, then I have a problem. Is this a new thing to get guys in private and then just start demanding higher and higher amounts, implying you will get nude/explicit or just straight lying and saying you will?

I guess it seems like some shy new girls are legitimately nervous about being naked, but still want money, so they just trick people into sending tokens by saying they will do stuff, but decide they are 'too shy' at the last minute.

The one girl after I basically threatened to complain to the site support finally did take her underwear off, but not until I explained like three times how she was being deceptive and then said something about support.

I think it's great if girls want to preserve their dignity and not be explicit or whatever, just not okay to lie and scam people.
I think you are very polite and with a far nice heart than mine to see them this way :KEKWlaugh:. For me, they're just (online) prostitutes, nothing more, nothing less, and at least show some tits to please us should've been mandatory. I really hate this "teasing" camsluts who charge a lot to just do anything lesse sensual than an Instagram video, it's just pretentious and does not make they less than the cheap whores they are. C'mon, they make a living by being a fap material and being a jerk off doll, the least they must do it's estimulate us with nude boobs.

After all, money does not come from trees, at least I wanna cum on a nice nude young princess baring it all after a stressful day in the office :KEKWlaugh:.
 
Hannah Hays
1-2355dded7a8a524e0.jpg
x68b2e6f01f3a97fd.jpg
 
I dropped her a few years back too, the tattoo wasn't even that big by then (and I'm with you on this, it looks terrible). My problem with her was that she kept bimbo-ing up, but the content was not bimbo worthy for lack of a better description. She was doing GFE teasing content, while looking like a vegas whore. At a certain point I just couldn't follow her anymore.
My problem with her was she clearly didn't enjoy her videos enough to even fake them. They were just sad, and uncomfortable. If you can't even sell the illusion, then just stop.
 
Back
Top Bottom