CREATE and FUCK your own AI GIRLFRIEND
TRY FOR FREE
x

Simp Chat Ashton Birdie - Discussion Thread

Sort by date Sort by reaction score
anonranger said:
trying apply pressure to get something she has said she doesn't want to do.
Click to expand...
This point I agree with you. She should not do something she not want to do. I also agree with you that people are not comprehending literal meaning of what she describe. People read one thing, and imagine it says something else. But this is also problem she is creating for herself. She should describe what is and is not seen in content people can buy, so there is no misunderstanding. She must also keep promises she makes.

I miss her old YouTube videos. Not for political talking points, but for her presentation that was unique to her. She usually described her thoughts with sarcasm and funny examples. Even when I disagreed with her point, I still got to laugh. She once kept taking a drink between points, and then said an exaggerated "ah" after, throughout the video, it was very funny. She also once made a video about YouTube banning people for their political content, so she will in future have to make makeup tutorial videos, and she doesn't know how to apply lipstick. She then made exaggerated bad presentation about lipstick, which made me laugh for several minutes. I don't think she understands all the reasons why people liked her videos, and that she can make other humorous videos that are not political.

Since she no longer makes her YouTube videos and also did not make videos for purposely bad makeup humor, she decide to sell OF content because of her obvious good looks. I feel badly for her, but also not understand why she not take advantage of what she has.

She is a pristine beauty which is rare today. Despite being a modern California girl, she has no implants, no tattoos, not even piercings, so she can match classic looks. She very talented at copying movie star characters, why she not copying them for OF content? She could recreate their tasteful nude photo or scene. If she said she is selling shot for shot copy of famous content, people know what it is. This is something that the other hideous OF creators not have the look or the talent to do. She does not want to "show holes", which she can embrace with pubic hair to hide holes like classic movie star.

Maybe she is too insecure to make content like movie star? She afraid too many people who only know implants, tattoos and piercings will tell her they are disappointed by her pristine natural beauty?

Or maybe she does not know that her favorite movie stars made tasteful nude photos and scenes? She is a girl after all, so probably not aware. Or maybe she think content like Kristy Swanson nude photos were not tasteful, and instead porn. But probably not, she would not dress in Kristy Swanson costume if she thinks she was a porn star. She probably not aware of these, and not taking advantage of her unique look and talent.
 
Last edited:
Lets not pretend that Ashton Birdie doesn't know exactly what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing.

She understands that she can get away with being a scammer, and if anyone pipes up enough, throw them a refund, which keeps her in the good graces of onlyfans et al.


I get how some of you might think you can get in her good graces, that you're special, that you're her friend. I assure you, that's not the case. Just because she banged a bunch of uggo libertarian podcaster bros doesn't mean she's going to bang you or treat you like anything other than an ATM. What those podcaster bros had that you don't is this magic thing called Clout, which is something she's been chasing her whole life.
Onlyfans might seem like a departure, but it's the same grift as it always was. Ashton Birdie doesn't give a shit about what she does, or what comes out of her mouth, she case about being popular and notable, and she'll do anything to get it, and any bad behavior, she'll lie about to avoid responsibility.

Some of y'all have never dealt with BPD in real life, and it shows in how you talk about her. She's actually diagnosed, like on the meds, sometimes, and that means you can't treat her, or the interactions you have with her, as though they're with a normal person, because if you do, you'll be in her web, right where she wants you.
 
josephcool23 said:
This point I agree with you. She should not do something she not want to do. I also agree with you that people are not comprehending literal meaning of what she describe. People read one thing, and imagine it says something else. But this is also problem she is creating for herself. She should describe what is and is not seen in content people can buy, so there is no misunderstanding. She must also keep promises she makes.

I miss her old YouTube videos. Not for political talking points, but for her presentation that was unique to her. She usually described her thoughts with sarcasm and funny examples. Even when I disagreed with her point, I still got to laugh. She once kept taking a drink between points, and then said an exaggerated "ah" after, throughout the video, it was very funny. She also once made a video about YouTube banning people for their political content, so she will in future have to make makeup tutorial videos, and she doesn't know how to apply lipstick. She then made exaggerated bad presentation about lipstick, which made me laugh for several minutes. I don't think she understands all the reasons why people liked her videos, and that she can make other humorous videos that are not political.

Since she no longer makes her YouTube videos and also did not make videos for purposely bad makeup humor, she decide to sell OF content because of her obvious good looks. I feel badly for her, but also not understand why she not take advantage of what she has.

She is a pristine beauty which is rare today. Despite being a modern California girl, she has no implants, no tattoos, not even piercings, so she can match classic looks. She very talented at copying movie star characters, why she not copying them for OF content? She could recreate their tasteful nude photo or scene. If she said she is selling shot for shot copy of famous content, people know what it is. This is something that the other hideous OF creators not have the look or the talent to do. She does not want to "show holes", which she can embrace with pubic hair to hide holes like classic movie star.

Maybe she is too insecure to make content like movie star? She afraid too many people who only know implants, tattoos and piercings will tell her they are disappointed by her pristine natural beauty?

Or maybe she does not know that her favorite movie stars made tasteful nude photos and scenes? She is a girl after all, so probably not aware. Or maybe she think content like Kristy Swanson nude photos were not tasteful, and instead porn. But probably not, she would not dress in Kristy Swanson costume if she thinks she was a porn star. She probably not aware of these, and not taking advantage of her unique look and talent.
Click to expand...
I feel the same way about her youtube, she said she has more yourube content planned. She does still care about the same things she did then as said on stream.
 
justsauce16 said:
Lets not pretend that Ashton Birdie doesn't know exactly what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing.

She understands that she can get away with being a scammer, and if anyone pipes up enough, throw them a refund, which keeps her in the good graces of onlyfans et al.


I get how some of you might think you can get in her good graces, that you're special, that you're her friend. I assure you, that's not the case. Just because she banged a bunch of uggo libertarian podcaster bros doesn't mean she's going to bang you or treat you like anything other than an ATM. What those podcaster bros had that you don't is this magic thing called Clout, which is something she's been chasing her whole life.
Onlyfans might seem like a departure, but it's the same grift as it always was. Ashton Birdie doesn't give a shit about what she does, or what comes out of her mouth, she case about being popular and notable, and she'll do anything to get it, and any bad behavior, she'll lie about to avoid responsibility.

Some of y'all have never dealt with BPD in real life, and it shows in how you talk about her. She's actually diagnosed, like on the meds, sometimes, and that means you can't treat her, or the interactions you have with her, as though they're with a normal person, because if you do, you'll be in her web, right where she wants you.
Click to expand...
She had a successful and growing YouTube channel. (One that will grown again if she finds a groove she likes.) I have known many people with BPD both medicated and not. I don't see that is Ashton.
 
anonranger said:
she said she has more yourube content planned.
Click to expand...
Yourube? I think this is typing mistake. But I look up "rube" - "An uninformed, unsophisticated, or unintelligent person."
Maybe that what she think of her viewers?

If she make new YouTube videos with same style as her old videos, even if about other topics, she probably will get many viewers. When I think about her style, most of her old videos were about finding negative news from that day, and making point about why they were bad, thoughtless, or inconsistent, in positive humorous way. She could probably do the same style with reviewing anything else. She could review bad products, or food, or movies, and if she kept same humorous style, even without interest in the product, it would still be good entertainment.
 
josephcool23 said:
Yourube? I think this is typing mistake. But I look up "rube" - "An uninformed, unsophisticated, or unintelligent person."
Maybe that what she think of her viewers?

If she make new YouTube videos with same style as her old videos, even if about other topics, she probably will get many viewers. When I think about her style, most of her old videos were about finding negative news from that day, and making point about why they were bad, thoughtless, or inconsistent, in positive humorous way. She could probably do the same style with reviewing anything else. She could review bad products, or food, or movies, and if she kept same humorous style, even without interest in the product, it would still be good entertainment.
Click to expand...
Yeah I ment youtube my spell check has been fucky lately.

I agree that she has a good opertunity on youtube, even if she wanted to rebrand a bit she has a running start and a mostly clean slate.
 
justsauce16 said:
I don't think there's grounds for that. Nobody's even close to encouraging harassment.

Unless you consider warning your fellow man that there's a scammer named Ashton Birdie, and to avoid giving her money, harassment, of course.
Click to expand...
We did get a mod warning once recently, i was in the chat then idk if it was directed at the warning or not. Yet the mod did say not to use name calling at each other or this thread would be locked.
 
jimbob1055 said:
We did get a mod warning once recently, i was in the chat then idk if it was directed at the warning or not. Yet the mod did say not to use name calling at each other or this thread would be locked.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the expectation is that we're at least cordial with eachother, which is a good policy.

Nothing about being nice to Ashton though. There are reasonable lines to not cross of course, like, outright hatred isn't generally productive even if it's probably ok as far as the rules go, and bringing additional heat on SC is a no-go as well, like, it has plenty of that.
 
heehatatt said:
wait when did this chick go from being some conservative youtuber type thing to being on onlyfans?
Click to expand...
She's not conservative and never was. At least I never viewed her as one. She attempted to be conservative and then attempted to be libertarian. Now I think she's a lefty again. The excuse she gave was she was "treated poorly" by the guys she dated in those spheres. I'm sorry but your morals and values don't dramatically change just because of a few bad encounters. It can happen slowly over time or with a partner with different values then you. Like it did for my family member. However, it wouldn't change instantly like it does for her. Which is why I say she never was one. Also, she was a conservative Youtuber and an OF creator at the same time.
 
heehatatt said:
wait when did this chick go from being some conservative youtuber type thing to being on onlyfans?
Click to expand...
Ashton spent the first Trump term and a bit beyond as a right leaning libertarian/conservative (grifter), and then a bunch of sketchy shit happened between her and other people (grifters) in that sphere, so she rebranded through a series of different formats (of grifts) before landing on OF hoe who doesn’t actually do any content.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom