In my personal experience once a girls post starts averaging about 50 likes per post the likelihood an agency taking over skyrockets. All the accounts I know who actually manage their own page only get around 30 per post.
Discussion Agencies are ruining OF for me...
- Thread starter xyz001
- Start date
- Thread starter xyz001
- Start date
- Reply 1017
I think at this point all ukrainian models do this,exact same is with mila azul,nancy ace and niemira when i was subbed.
You may be right. Another Ukrainian girl called Florence Agapi has the exact same bio as Sha and is always online as well. Pretty sure Sha's best friend Demmy Blaze has the same agency as well, since their OF all lowered their subscription price to $3 at the same time and began posting a single picture or short video every two days.
The Russian girls have them too. A guy from the internet got a model called Cheryl Blossom to admit she employed an agency (he even posted part of the conversation), but she asked him not to tell anyone (which he did,lol). Cheryl even has the same agency as Samanta Lily, a model she worked with years ago.
I think what happens is, when one girl gets an agency, she then recommends it to the models she's in contact with. Maybe the agencies even pay them to do it, who knows? But that would explain why Sha, Demmy and Florence have the same agency, as do Cheryl and Samanta.
And they all know it's a scam, because otherwise they wouldn't be begging those who call them out to keep it a secret.
They must have spent exactly 0 seconds as a subscriber or talked to a subscriber of the platform before deciding on their strategies.
stuff like this will always remind me of this - mila azul and nancy ace,one is doing hardcore,the other is not. figure out which one
Doesn’t matter as along as the revenue line goes up and to the right.
I severely doubt any model who uses an agency would continue to employ them if they were seeing less revenue. So, if we continue to see them—it must be working.
To the model, if the cost of doing business is losing the “enthusiast” who wants a more “bespoke” experience to make greater money overall, then then the vast majority would likely take that—and have—10/10 times.
From a “maximize revenue” perspective, if I was an OF model, I’d tell the agency to let me handle my top 10-20 whales (enough to be personally manageable), and let them deal with everyone else, where the cost/benefit per minute spent isn’t nearly as lucrative.
Yeah there’s got to be a solid chunk of people who don’t care or just plain don’t know if their content is agency managed or properly personal. They’re just happy to part with their money for a perceived connection, or content which ticks the boxes they like.
More than just a solid chunk. I’d say the 80/20 rule applies.
The 20% are the people in this forum, who are willing to donate their disposable time following all this shit.
The 80% revenue base is the majority. They just follow 1-2 models, pay and get the fuck on with life.
The bitter truth is most likely that catering to the 20%, the kind of people who would ask multiple DM questions clarifying the title/description about just how much of the nipple is visible in a $25 PPV…would not be a sustainable business, from an ROI perspective.
So, agencies abound.
If you think that a majority of models make this type of in-depth cost/benefit analysis you are giving them a lot of credit and I'm not sure that they don't see a negative trend, could just be that they accept it or don't realize that it's due to the agency but rather think that it's their content or them.
The problem is that if the 80% is one-time customers because they don't deliver on what they are selling or deliver a sub-par experience then you are constantly chasing new users, hence the spam of free subscriptions and mass DMs. Retaining a customer is almost most often less work than acquiring a new one.
And there are many levels of service between constant mass PPV spam and a bespoke experience, I don't think people in this thread expects a bespoke 1on1 experience because we know that means dropping thousands of dollars a month at minimum if it's a bigger model.
Not always true in my experience
Thelittlered who manages her page averages over 100 likes per post, Sasha Foxxx who manages her page averages nearly 200 likes per page, Jasmine Jae who manages her page averages over 100 likes per post
A few others i could mention but those are examples
I may disagree, because the only one legit OF page I’m subscribed to that is 100% run by the model is a Ukrainian model. It’s the most adequately run page I’ve ever seen.
Remember that OF chicks are some of the laziest people in society, hot women who have had the world handed to them on a silver platter.
They're the type of people who won't care how much money they could make doing it themselves, if they could get someone else to do it instead while they spend 30 minutes a month doing selfies and letting some poor guy in Bangladesh pretending to sext their parasocial whales who are too stupid or too horny to realise (or admit) they're not actually talking to their pure virginally onlyfans whore.
They're the type of people who won't care how much money they could make doing it themselves, if they could get someone else to do it instead while they spend 30 minutes a month doing selfies and letting some poor guy in Bangladesh pretending to sext their parasocial whales who are too stupid or too horny to realise (or admit) they're not actually talking to their pure virginally onlyfans whore.
I get what you are saying, but lets all not pretend we wouldent all outsource our work to some guy in Bangladesh for 20% of my paycheque because I know damn well I would while I sit around and do what ever the fuck I wanted, and not wake up at 8am and work till 5pm and just attend daily meetings, and let my man do the hard work of my job.
Exactly, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
…but don’t let that truth get in the way of the casual misogyny (not saying the models should be put on a pedestal, either) of this board, though, where every OF girl is a “lazy, dumb, thot, scamming, whore”.
Lot of sour grapes bitching and put downs from people who don’t have the looks or ability to do anything in remotely the same stratosphere, so they need to constantly put the models down to feel better about themselves. “I’d never do it,” they’d say…yeah, because they can’t. Nothing easier than someone rejecting something that was never a possibility for them.
(cue the brainlet reacts from those whom this shoe fits
)
Yeah of course, but their work isn't just typing shit or whatever, it's literally themselves. So outsourcing to an agency reduces the quality of their work because they're too lazy to do it properly, impacting on the simps and the coomers who get lesser quality content and less of it.
It's funny when the girl herself is live and not touching her phone at all but can still get DMs sent from the agency. Yes some messages can be scheduled in advanced but it seems the agency doesn't care about common sense and trying to maintain the illusion that the girl writes everything herself. Either think fans are too stupid to put 1 and 1 together or they have sales goals to reach and put their own interests first
A few thoughts about recent posts.
1. I wouldn’t really mind if some of these models just admitted to having an agency and they just sold their content. The sexting aspect obviously is gone if they do that, but just have it be an on-demand storefront for your content if that’s what it is.
2. I think a lot of people are also annoyed with the constantly scamming, misleading captions that these agencies put in bundles. Then they try to make us feel bad when we complain that the stuff in the caption isn’t included. If you don’t want to do full nudity, just say so. But it’s a lot easier to make money when the buyer thinks that’s what they’re getting. Just be upfront and honest.
But the problem with both of those two points is they would make a lot less money if they did. And when the vast, vast majority of working-age people put in an honest-days work, it’s incredibly annoying to see people who have it insanely easy and still can’t seem to do that on their own and/or truthfully.
And maybe this is just me, but no, I wouldn’t do what these girls do if I was them. I’d manage my whales and talk to them regularly, then get to everyone else when I have time. Spend an hour or two a couple times a day responding to the normies. And if there’s a day or two where you don’t get to them, big deal.
I think this can all be summed up this way: these women have some of the easiest lives imaginable, and when normal, hardworking people see that they can’t/won’t do the bare minimum, they look down on them.
1. I wouldn’t really mind if some of these models just admitted to having an agency and they just sold their content. The sexting aspect obviously is gone if they do that, but just have it be an on-demand storefront for your content if that’s what it is.
2. I think a lot of people are also annoyed with the constantly scamming, misleading captions that these agencies put in bundles. Then they try to make us feel bad when we complain that the stuff in the caption isn’t included. If you don’t want to do full nudity, just say so. But it’s a lot easier to make money when the buyer thinks that’s what they’re getting. Just be upfront and honest.
But the problem with both of those two points is they would make a lot less money if they did. And when the vast, vast majority of working-age people put in an honest-days work, it’s incredibly annoying to see people who have it insanely easy and still can’t seem to do that on their own and/or truthfully.
And maybe this is just me, but no, I wouldn’t do what these girls do if I was them. I’d manage my whales and talk to them regularly, then get to everyone else when I have time. Spend an hour or two a couple times a day responding to the normies. And if there’s a day or two where you don’t get to them, big deal.
I think this can all be summed up this way: these women have some of the easiest lives imaginable, and when normal, hardworking people see that they can’t/won’t do the bare minimum, they look down on them.
Yeah, for every woman who looks good enough to get paid for literally just flashing tits on OF and whatnot, there's hundreds more who try and don't get a second look. It's not as easy as "tits out=free cash" although I'll admit the bar for this is far lower for women than it is for men, at least to my understanding.